<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Incredible Military Technologies &#8211; Future Military Warfare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futurefirepower.com/5-incredible-military-technologies-future-military-warfare/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/5-incredible-military-technologies-future-military-warfare</link>
	<description>The Newest Military Weapon Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 02:31:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skull789</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/5-incredible-military-technologies-future-military-warfare/comment-page-1#comment-31961</link>
		<dc:creator>Skull789</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/5-incredible-military-technologies-future-military-warfare#comment-31961</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised that they are over complicating the rail gun. If they just first solid rounds they wouldn&#039;t need to create shells that were that expense and hard to make. It wouldn&#039;t do the same amount of damage but it would be a cost effective shots. And let&#039;s face it. Firing 40 solid metal rounds would easily go through several tanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised that they are over complicating the rail gun. If they just first solid rounds they wouldn&#8217;t need to create shells that were that expense and hard to make. It wouldn&#8217;t do the same amount of damage but it would be a cost effective shots. And let&#8217;s face it. Firing 40 solid metal rounds would easily go through several tanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/5-incredible-military-technologies-future-military-warfare/comment-page-1#comment-24126</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 21:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/5-incredible-military-technologies-future-military-warfare#comment-24126</guid>
		<description>Really as of now (date at bottom of comment) it has been at least a year since I last saw the declassification of the Rail Gun. I know for a fact that there are now more advanced Mobile Tactical High Energy Lasers probably way more advanced then this one.  The Mobile Tactical High Energy Laser? I know of at least 10 different more advanced more powerful lasers. Like the resistant person who made the before comment, these are, at least in the militaries eyes out dated. 
                                                                                                                     Sincerely Andrew D.F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really as of now (date at bottom of comment) it has been at least a year since I last saw the declassification of the Rail Gun. I know for a fact that there are now more advanced Mobile Tactical High Energy Lasers probably way more advanced then this one.  The Mobile Tactical High Energy Laser? I know of at least 10 different more advanced more powerful lasers. Like the resistant person who made the before comment, these are, at least in the militaries eyes out dated.<br />
                                                                                                                     Sincerely Andrew D.F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/5-incredible-military-technologies-future-military-warfare/comment-page-1#comment-17052</link>
		<dc:creator>No</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/5-incredible-military-technologies-future-military-warfare#comment-17052</guid>
		<description>This is all ten years out dated. Anytime the military says &quot;10 years out&quot; chances are it&#039;s been field tested and proven successful at least 5 years prior. I.E the railgun. You honestly think that&#039;s something of the future? No. It&#039;s reality now, even if it&#039;s not uncommon or technically classified and hidden. DARPA is working on antimatter / gravity manipulation - This stuff is outdated. 
Or I could be wrong....(But think about it - The SR-71 was designed in the 40&#039;s - Tested in 50&#039;s used in mid fifties and declassified in the 60&#039;s)
So what do you think DARPA and other such groups are researching now?
1) Directed Energy Weapons - Legitimate Ray guns from star track. 
2) Biological weapons. Things like Siren Gas in foam form
3) Gravity and space manipulation.  Things straight out of a movie, or Ratchet and Clank the video game...
Anything we can even set our eyes on is OUT DATED to say the least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all ten years out dated. Anytime the military says &#8220;10 years out&#8221; chances are it&#8217;s been field tested and proven successful at least 5 years prior. I.E the railgun. You honestly think that&#8217;s something of the future? No. It&#8217;s reality now, even if it&#8217;s not uncommon or technically classified and hidden. DARPA is working on antimatter / gravity manipulation &#8211; This stuff is outdated.<br />
Or I could be wrong&#8230;.(But think about it &#8211; The SR-71 was designed in the 40&#8242;s &#8211; Tested in 50&#8242;s used in mid fifties and declassified in the 60&#8242;s)<br />
So what do you think DARPA and other such groups are researching now?<br />
1) Directed Energy Weapons &#8211; Legitimate Ray guns from star track.<br />
2) Biological weapons. Things like Siren Gas in foam form<br />
3) Gravity and space manipulation.  Things straight out of a movie, or Ratchet and Clank the video game&#8230;<br />
Anything we can even set our eyes on is OUT DATED to say the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/5-incredible-military-technologies-future-military-warfare/comment-page-1#comment-12888</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 02:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/5-incredible-military-technologies-future-military-warfare#comment-12888</guid>
		<description>Sagar,

If you want your opinion to matter - learn how to spell.  Just be happy our country has one (or many...) of these at our disposal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sagar,</p>
<p>If you want your opinion to matter &#8211; learn how to spell.  Just be happy our country has one (or many&#8230;) of these at our disposal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: на вооружении</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/5-incredible-military-technologies-future-military-warfare/comment-page-1#comment-7159</link>
		<dc:creator>на вооружении</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/5-incredible-military-technologies-future-military-warfare#comment-7159</guid>
		<description>The Railguns it is a very prospective development</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Railguns it is a very prospective development</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sagar</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/5-incredible-military-technologies-future-military-warfare/comment-page-1#comment-2403</link>
		<dc:creator>sagar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 07:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/5-incredible-military-technologies-future-military-warfare#comment-2403</guid>
		<description>i have seen last episod fo future weapons of CUB_97
it is well designed but it is use to destroy the population ,so what ever u have created it is the best weapon for battel then also my view is it  is a distructive one</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have seen last episod fo future weapons of CUB_97<br />
it is well designed but it is use to destroy the population ,so what ever u have created it is the best weapon for battel then also my view is it  is a distructive one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.376 seconds -->

