Comments on: Bomb Iran Plan

By: myxpyx23

myxpyx23 — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 03:54:01 +0000

if they will attack Iran because of their nukes how about the other country who keep on making big nuclear warheads?

By: paddy

paddy — Sat, 01 Nov 2008 05:36:44 +0000

“An american quoting international” law (under International Law, he who uses human shields is culpable for their deaths) you wingless and the rest of you america are a joke… going around waving your big stick at every one… you should get out more and see the world and meet the people not just bomb the country and kill the people….over 1 million men,woman and children killed in Iraq…. how can you live with that…..??? america is ment to be shining light of the free world…. setting good exanples….. to middle east and the rest of the world…..Getting back to international law i am postive that there is some thing in there about invading another country….. like the other day when america attacked in side Syria boarder and a number of time in Pakistans boarder.OH. its ok you are fighting a war on terror….. or come on, it is a war for oil and power… Why did you invade iraq…??? with out the UNs backing… that right the ” coalition of the willing ” all the country that you have in your back pocket….. giving then aid or weapon tec. my country being one of then AUSTRALIA…. yes Australia we some how got sucked into your war…. maybe it was weapon tec or free trade who knows…. The world is changing in 10-15 year the world is going to be very diffrent…. no matter how many country you invade or how many people you bomb the sleeping giant is waking up and becoming very good friends with russia….
you will lose you power… and than you will have wished that you were a bit nicer to others…. it is how the world works “what go around come around”

By: Kevin

Kevin — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 01:41:48 +0000

We should first start by bombing their nuclear facilities. After that we should disable their air force and missile capabilities. After that all we need to do is send in a joint Israeli and USMC Force to quickly take Tehran. We can capture Ahmadinejad and put most of the government on trial. All we need is for them to attack Israel first… Otherwise this would not work.

By: brad

brad — Sun, 13 Jul 2008 01:34:21 +0000

just place anti icbms all over israel and just watch Ahmadinejad cry then he’ll declare war on israel and then the insurgents of course would be called in and then osama would finaly be forced to reveal hat he was using all that jihad shit as brain wash to recruit soldiers and all the terrorists would feel betryaed and charge israel with dynamite get crushed with active denial systems and after world war three which without guirrela tacticts would be an easy score for basically everyone besides middle east america gets all the oil they want just before global warming becomes irrversible and everyone in the world dies
and god lived happily ever after the end

By: Wingless

Wingless — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 21:21:28 +0000

“They are not a threat to us at the moment The youth are pushed to the wall and they want change and want it bad. Give the new generation a chance to make a change. We bomb them and we have at least another two generations of enemies in Iran. Leave them alone and in a decade we will have normalized relations with the up and comers. ”

Right, we’ve been saying that for 20 years… We’ve been relying on it for the past decade. It ain’t happening.

“Russia may back them up, then it’s WW3.”

Gimme a break! Russia? They can barely service their vehicles. Even if they could they are fielding a dilipidated force of mostly obselete JUNK. Look at how easily the USA took out Iraqi armour in the first Gulf War. HOW QUICKLY WE FORGET! SADDAM HUSSEIN HAD THE 4TH LARGEST ARMY IN THE WORLD!

The T-72, T-80 and T-90 fielded by Russia are NO MATCH for Abrams, not to mention the Merkava (now w/ Trophy Protection System, only G*d knows why the USA isn’t picking this system up!). They are alittle better on planes, esp. the SU series, but these don’t stack up against the F22. The IAF would also be in the air and they are the best pilots in the world (highest number of aces per capita)

As for Iran, their Air-Force is INSIGNIFIGANT. They are trying to build it up now (with their increased oil revenues) with more modern machines but it takes many years to build a modern air force with well skilled pilots.

They’re tanks are upgraded T-72s but that is not a fair fight for the Merkava and LAHAT missles.

What Iran can and will do is lob thousands of missles at Israel and Iraq. This will be the ultimate test of the Arrow2 & Patriot3 missles. They will also launch terror attacks throughout the world. In terms of Fedayeen and indiscriminate killing they can do some damage but in conventional war? Gimme a break.

Iran is destabilizing the region and the world. They are occupying Southern Lebanon with Hezbollah and killing CHristians. They attack Israel (5 years after Israel LEFT ALL OF LEBANON!), then retreat to CHristian Villages (like Bint Jbil), causing massive collatoral damage (under International Law, he who uses human shields is culpable for their deaths). Iran funds and arms the insurgency in Iraq. Iran massacres its own people, killing homosexuals, dissidents, Christians. Iran has called for THE DESTRUCTION OF ISRAEL.

Like Iraq, Iran is sending out invitations for its own demise. Persians – wake up – if you don’t put an end to Ahmadijad today then somebody else will have to do it tommorrow. At the end of the day it is YOU who are responsible for the dictators in your country. It is high time you took responsibility.

By: Wynn

Wynn — Sun, 18 May 2008 23:57:30 +0000

I know Heath, I was just joking around (RE: to both of your comments). But, the products may be cheaper, but they’re inferior products….

By: Gisse

Gisse — Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:46:15 +0000

Same predictions where with bombing of Serbia. 3 days of bombing and all is over. Army will be destroyed and all gone, we can walk around like we want.

Bombing lasted 78 days, only things what US destroyed are good relationships with Serbs and economical infrastructure of one European country. Army was untouched (14 tanks and some junk, only lose where some Migs 29 and only because Serbia had 14).

By: Musa

Musa — Mon, 24 Mar 2008 14:21:09 +0000

What do you mean by “PUNISH THEM”….
3 questions…..
1………How many Nukes does the US have?
2……..Which is the only country that has used them at war?……( In case u don’t remember “JAPAN”)
3………Whcih country has always been at war?……..

By: Stealth

Stealth — Tue, 18 Mar 2008 06:03:32 +0000

Russia may back them up, then it’s WW3.

By: Tony

Tony — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 06:50:03 +0000

Yes, we are America and we are big and strong, we have said and demonstrated this time and time again. With that said bombing Iran is about the dumbest thing we could do right now. They are not a threat to us at the moment The youth are pushed to the wall and they want change and want it bad. Give the new generation a chance to make a change. We bomb them and we have at least another two generations of enemies in Iran. Leave them alone and in a decade we will have normalized relations with the up and comers.

Bomb them and watch us get in a nuclear pissing match with China and Russia. Don’t bomb and have a trading partner. The worst that can happen is they try to launch a nuke later on and one of the permanently based Virginia Class Subs has a Neutron weenie roast.
Who knows If the neocons wait long enough they can use a antimatter weapon. (know the old saying good things come to those who wait. A neocon warmonger that waits long enough gets to reap the benefit of another deal made with the Satanand bring us one step closer to Armageddon.

By: Heath

Heath — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:10:31 +0000

Oh and D. Wynn the United States Marine Corp is part of the Navy technically speaking, so your are kinda calling yourself and a whole lot of people (roughly 500,000 navy enlisted and reserve without the USMC) a retard.

By: Heath

Heath — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:57:55 +0000

Look American egos are really going destroy this country if they think that they are going to just go in and bomb Iran with no political and economical repercussions from other country even so called allies. There is an estimated 1.3 to 1.8 billion Muslim population in this world. You honestly think that attacking another middle eastern country will not provoke more anti western way of thinking. With China and Russia refusing to get behind the US and the UN right now what do you think they will say to a bombing of an ally. Considering both of these countries hold nuclear weapons China having the third largest nuclear warhead stockpile with Russia the second largest in the world a nuclear bomb is out of the question with Iran. And China having the worlds largest army by size and even by 2020 China will have the worlds largest navy is no laughing matter. The only good thing about that whole thing is that its disorganized and their equipment is outdated but that is changing by the day. But the worst thing they could do is not bomb back but stop exporting the the US. I don’t know if anyone continues to look at tags anymore but a majority of our daily goods do come from China. If they were to impose any kind of trade ban with us it would cripple us. Goods that are cheap now are because they are able to be produced cheaper in Asian countries by labor costs and few environmental watchdogs to raise hell when they destroy the environment. If they impose restrictions watch out it will be a recession if not depression in the US economy. We also have to look at fact that the more wars we are in the more people will hate us. Venezuela has been building up a army for years now and guess who is one of their closest allies supplying their military, Russia. Don’t forget the real reason we can’t attack is oil disruption to the US and the world. The reason we haven’t bombed Iran is because the US cannot afford to. If anyone thinks I am not patriotic I had one grandfather in Korea(Army), my brother in-law was in Iraq(Marines) along with a cousin of mine(Army), my older sister was a Marine for 4 years and works now in the private sector with the army corp of engineers and I will be leaving for Marine boot camp in South Carolina this summer.

By: D. Wynn USMC (Recruit)

D. Wynn USMC (Recruit) — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:26:28 +0000

i 150% agree with tom, their technology is NO WHERE close to our, and their military couldn’t even take on our retards that are Navy….if they were to take on our Marines, they would be wiped off the face of the earth….on extra comment….Iran wants nukes….GIVE THEM TO THEM, NUKE IRAN!!!! OORAH!!!!

By: Brian

Brian — Sat, 24 Nov 2007 00:39:34 +0000

Just a wild guess but I think the US would be able to handle increase activity in Iraq if they had to.

By: paul

paul — Sat, 13 Oct 2007 00:21:14 +0000

He is in big dream for sure . he need 3 things to get back up first russian must give them approval plus china 2? un should be approved 3.usa congress must approve . if he get it still he must think twiss to strick for my research on iran and usa military they are in good shape , but every on know usa is superpower, what happend things turn aroun for usa basicly loss the quick war and acheive nada. it might be only on plane or sup to drup nuke to intire target to let them respect on conditional seafire. or thy may have bomb of nuke to respond to intire usa and all around usa base , as i see iran prisident politicly won againest usa and israel . what make sure usa can win this war ?plus usa intelligent know pre well about iran military as i know just letter in the internet they know much more .thank you all

By: tom

tom — Tue, 02 Oct 2007 05:56:04 +0000

people overestimate iran, their top technology is what we abandoned in the 60-70s and their own people hate the iranian govt and military, also the fact that they have no money, no capabilities and the talk of causing another greater insurgency is just weak minded threats to try to warn an overwhelming power. when the whole middle east suffers because of irans ignorance and stone age mentality the so called insurgency will turn on the iranian leaders not the US.
basically iran could easilly be beaten in 2-3 days with probably zero US casualtys

By: Simon

Simon — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 02:04:52 +0000

Iran will fight back against any US lead attack. but they will be punished over and over again. They may use insurgents / terrorist attacks to get back at the attacking force in both the mid-east and in more local zones. but again, they will be hit again and again. Submission may take time, but they will lose. the number of states now reported to be now considering force against Iran is growing.
Iran is playing a dangerous game, which it may live to regret. It will not be easy, but Iraqi went. As long as the US does not get into the game of State building again.

By: Ali

Ali — Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:23:39 +0000

Yet US can make quick and big destruction in many areas in Iran but I assure you that US will fail in long, unlimited, bloody and expensive war. Iran will start moving its longs arms in the middle east and go into years of attacking US troops and making the whole land under US army on fire. There is large number of people supporting Iran in the gulf and those people can be armed by Iran. Oil prices will fly and will reach 3 digits. The whole world economy will suffer and more countries will get involved into this complication which results in pressure on Americans to stop the war but it is no more their decision. They can start it but Americans will not be able to stop it. It is Iranian’s decision will be.