<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Future Military Weapon Technology - Future Firepower</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futurefirepower.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com</link>
	<description>The Newest Military Weapon Systems</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on F-22 Raptor&#8217;s Impressive Maneuverability by MATT</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/f-22-raptors-impressive-maneuverability#comment-7468</link>
		<dc:creator>MATT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/f-22-raptors-impressive-maneuverability#comment-7468</guid>
		<description>the f-22 is the best simply because there are inhibitors built within the craft to keep the pilots from killing themselves. I mean if u cant even use the full potential of the air craft for the pilots sake then u have clearly reached the pinnical of man'd fighters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the f-22 is the best simply because there are inhibitors built within the craft to keep the pilots from killing themselves. I mean if u cant even use the full potential of the air craft for the pilots sake then u have clearly reached the pinnical of man&#8217;d fighters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Su-37 Terminator - Experimental Soviet Acrobatic Jet Fighter - &#8220;Super Flanker&#8221; Video by MATT</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/su-37-terminator-experimental-soviet-acrobatic-jet-fighter#comment-7467</link>
		<dc:creator>MATT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/su-37-terminator-experimental-soviet-acrobatic-jet-fighter#comment-7467</guid>
		<description>All that this video proves is that it is as maneuverable as the raptor, but the raptor is a stealth fighter equiped with aesa radar a deadly combination wich means the su-35 piolet wont know he's in a fight untill he is in a parachute on the way to the ground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All that this video proves is that it is as maneuverable as the raptor, but the raptor is a stealth fighter equiped with aesa radar a deadly combination wich means the su-35 piolet wont know he&#8217;s in a fight untill he is in a parachute on the way to the ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The British Accuracy International AS50 BMG Sniper Rifle by Dicko</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/the-british-accuracy-international-as50-bmg-sniper-rifle#comment-7440</link>
		<dc:creator>Dicko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/the-british-accuracy-international-as50-bmg-sniper-rifle#comment-7440</guid>
		<description>The AS50 is actually about 1.2kg heavier than the barret, at 14.1kg, while the barret weighs 12.9kg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The AS50 is actually about 1.2kg heavier than the barret, at 14.1kg, while the barret weighs 12.9kg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CheyTac Intervention M200 Sniper Rifle - .408 Caliber by flatline</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/shooter-movie-cheytac-intervention-m200-sniper-rifle#comment-7406</link>
		<dc:creator>flatline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 01:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/shooter-movie-cheytac-intervention-m200-sniper-rifle#comment-7406</guid>
		<description>ye nice paragraph about the cheytac and "marky mark(its not the 80's)" but the weapon used to take down the chopper was not a barrett m107, the barrett m107 is a semi-auto, so he wouldnt have to reload after every shot and none of the barretts actually reload like that so the movie messeed up, i mean the only barrett that is bolt action is the m99 which reloads likee a regular bolt action in the movie he just pulls back like its a lmg, wtf!! im 15 and i no that who ever published this "report is a dumb ass, but wut ever good effort</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ye nice paragraph about the cheytac and &#8220;marky mark(its not the 80&#8217;s)&#8221; but the weapon used to take down the chopper was not a barrett m107, the barrett m107 is a semi-auto, so he wouldnt have to reload after every shot and none of the barretts actually reload like that so the movie messeed up, i mean the only barrett that is bolt action is the m99 which reloads likee a regular bolt action in the movie he just pulls back like its a lmg, wtf!! im 15 and i no that who ever published this &#8220;report is a dumb ass, but wut ever good effort</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Russian Tank Forces - T90 Technology by tim</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/russian-tank-forces-t90-technology#comment-7400</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/?p=186#comment-7400</guid>
		<description>Russian forces are broken , they were barely able to beat up Georgia ,  they shot their own planes down, had terrible lines of communication, no modern intel gathering and a bunch of broken down tanks .

We should have given the Georgians a bunch of Javelin anti tank launchers and the Russian mouse would have had his drunken ass kicked back over the boarder . 

Thanks Vladimir for destroying the Russian military !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russian forces are broken , they were barely able to beat up Georgia ,  they shot their own planes down, had terrible lines of communication, no modern intel gathering and a bunch of broken down tanks .</p>
<p>We should have given the Georgians a bunch of Javelin anti tank launchers and the Russian mouse would have had his drunken ass kicked back over the boarder . </p>
<p>Thanks Vladimir for destroying the Russian military !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Fighter Jet in the World - Best Combat Jet in World by tim</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/best-fighter-jet-in-the-world-best-combat-jet-in-world#comment-7393</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/best-fighter-jet-in-the-world-best-combat-jet-in-world#comment-7393</guid>
		<description>Sorry anyone bleating on about the Indian/Russian fighter also needs their head examined  , a waste of money that would be twenty years behind US/Western tech .

Get Real</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry anyone bleating on about the Indian/Russian fighter also needs their head examined  , a waste of money that would be twenty years behind US/Western tech .</p>
<p>Get Real</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Fighter Jet in the World - Best Combat Jet in World by tim</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/best-fighter-jet-in-the-world-best-combat-jet-in-world#comment-7392</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/best-fighter-jet-in-the-world-best-combat-jet-in-world#comment-7392</guid>
		<description>I know an ex squadron leader on Tornadoe F3`s , he says that the f22 just sits at 50000 ft and is undetectable  the eurofighter can`t see it quick enough to win a bvr engagement . However in a dogfight the eurofighter would be all over the F22 . 

However I guess both the F22 and Eurofighter pilots do keep certain tactics hidden from prying eyes so who really knows ??? I think the eurofighter will come out as a very successful project , unlike the jsf which is just a bomb truck .

He did say that the tornado F3 would take out any current or planned soviet jet due to superior tactics , missiles and radar . Only in a merge would the Soviet pile of junk stand a chance and then the the asraam would blow it out the sky . 

Anyone bleating on about Soviet Jets needs their head examined , they are unreliable their sensors and weapons are ten to fifteen years behind US/UK systems and they are relying on their older pilots as their new trainees don`t get enough hours flying time .

Bye bye Vladimir you sucker , you destroyed the Soviet defence forces , a true comrade to the West !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know an ex squadron leader on Tornadoe F3`s , he says that the f22 just sits at 50000 ft and is undetectable  the eurofighter can`t see it quick enough to win a bvr engagement . However in a dogfight the eurofighter would be all over the F22 . </p>
<p>However I guess both the F22 and Eurofighter pilots do keep certain tactics hidden from prying eyes so who really knows ??? I think the eurofighter will come out as a very successful project , unlike the jsf which is just a bomb truck .</p>
<p>He did say that the tornado F3 would take out any current or planned soviet jet due to superior tactics , missiles and radar . Only in a merge would the Soviet pile of junk stand a chance and then the the asraam would blow it out the sky . </p>
<p>Anyone bleating on about Soviet Jets needs their head examined , they are unreliable their sensors and weapons are ten to fifteen years behind US/UK systems and they are relying on their older pilots as their new trainees don`t get enough hours flying time .</p>
<p>Bye bye Vladimir you sucker , you destroyed the Soviet defence forces , a true comrade to the West !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chinese Type 99 Tank - Newest Armor of China by leloup</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/chinese-type-99-tank-newest-armor-of-china#comment-7386</link>
		<dc:creator>leloup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 05:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/chinese-type-99-tank-newest-armor-of-china#comment-7386</guid>
		<description>This article is interesting. It is pathetic that confidence in M1A2 has to be established by means of funny (and racist) rhetorics, rather than objective observations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is interesting. It is pathetic that confidence in M1A2 has to be established by means of funny (and racist) rhetorics, rather than objective observations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Fighter Jet in the World - Best Combat Jet in World by Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/best-fighter-jet-in-the-world-best-combat-jet-in-world#comment-7369</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/best-fighter-jet-in-the-world-best-combat-jet-in-world#comment-7369</guid>
		<description>Dogfight??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dogfight??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Fighter Jet in the World - Best Combat Jet in World by Graeme Ellis</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/best-fighter-jet-in-the-world-best-combat-jet-in-world#comment-7367</link>
		<dc:creator>Graeme Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/best-fighter-jet-in-the-world-best-combat-jet-in-world#comment-7367</guid>
		<description>The F22 is crap. In a dogfight, it lacks manouverability. This forum was not 
the fighter with the most advanced electronics! The Su-37 can outclimb (considerably), and turn inside the F22's turn radius. Most of you seem to believe that because the F22 is American, it is better. 

The entire Su-27 range, plus the newer models was better than any comparable American fighter of the time! (Su27 - F-14,15,16, Su37 -F-18 ,F-22).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The F22 is crap. In a dogfight, it lacks manouverability. This forum was not<br />
the fighter with the most advanced electronics! The Su-37 can outclimb (considerably), and turn inside the F22&#8217;s turn radius. Most of you seem to believe that because the F22 is American, it is better. </p>
<p>The entire Su-27 range, plus the newer models was better than any comparable American fighter of the time! (Su27 - F-14,15,16, Su37 -F-18 ,F-22).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on F-22A Raptor - The Future of Air Superiority - F22 Video by Wayne Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/f-22a-raptor-fa-22-the-future-of-air-superiority#comment-7363</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/2007/04/01/f-22a-raptor-fa-22-the-future-of-air-superiority/#comment-7363</guid>
		<description>When the SU 37 becomes operational it will eat the F 22 for breakfast. 

The SU 37 is an agile cunning street brawler that can get in your face if it wishes - The F 22 is a muscle bound pretty boy that talks the talk but wont walk the walk here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the SU 37 becomes operational it will eat the F 22 for breakfast. </p>
<p>The SU 37 is an agile cunning street brawler that can get in your face if it wishes - The F 22 is a muscle bound pretty boy that talks the talk but wont walk the walk here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on V22 Osprey - Hybrid Helicopter Aircraft of the Future by Joe Schmocateli</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/v22-osprey-future-air-force-transport#comment-7355</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Schmocateli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/v22-osprey-future-air-force-transport#comment-7355</guid>
		<description>V-22 ALL DAI EVERY DAY!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>V-22 ALL DAI EVERY DAY!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Fighter Jet in the World - Best Combat Jet in World by mr_flibbles</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/best-fighter-jet-in-the-world-best-combat-jet-in-world#comment-7345</link>
		<dc:creator>mr_flibbles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/best-fighter-jet-in-the-world-best-combat-jet-in-world#comment-7345</guid>
		<description>all these planes are equally capable in combat and they each have at least one area they excel at, for example, the Eurofighter has very excellent manueverability and the F22 has the most advanced tech but it isn't just the plane's abilities that decide how good they are in combat.

There are many more factors that show an aircraft's true worth like weather conditions, the combat zone, altitude, pilot experience and last but not least, numbers, for example a squadron of 8 su 47s would smash a squadron of 3 F22s no matter how well equipped the F22s are, if this debate is to be solved then it needs a completely unbiased expert who knows everything about air combat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all these planes are equally capable in combat and they each have at least one area they excel at, for example, the Eurofighter has very excellent manueverability and the F22 has the most advanced tech but it isn&#8217;t just the plane&#8217;s abilities that decide how good they are in combat.</p>
<p>There are many more factors that show an aircraft&#8217;s true worth like weather conditions, the combat zone, altitude, pilot experience and last but not least, numbers, for example a squadron of 8 su 47s would smash a squadron of 3 F22s no matter how well equipped the F22s are, if this debate is to be solved then it needs a completely unbiased expert who knows everything about air combat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Russian Tank Forces - T90 Technology by chilled</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/russian-tank-forces-t90-technology#comment-7342</link>
		<dc:creator>chilled</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/?p=186#comment-7342</guid>
		<description>fellows try to think three dimensionally. sure , no doubt the united snakes has better technology, has better weapon system AT THE MOMENT.but  what is the underlying thing that makes it all work.MONEY. for the last 200 years they have been the richest nation and that money (part of it)went into funding high tech weapon systems.the russians even during the cold war just could not keep up with the expenditure.they failed as a nation not because of social unrest( that was the secondary reason) but because their government ran out of money. PERENNIAL TECHNOLOGICAL SUPERIORITY which most of you are automatically banking on is certainly not guaranteed. if a nation has enough resources sooner or later it will match up to you.you see technology percolates very fast and you can't really seal it.look at india , china , and hell even russia. they are managing to pull out some really impressive stuff despite shoe string budgets.all that stuff about russia following the wrong strategy and that you have all the brains , keep forgetting that under the situation that possibly was the only viable strategy. they produce cheap stuff ,coz that's all they could afford.
so the question to be asked is this .will US always maintain this financial edge? 
you know the answer to that question.
WORLD BANK- your own world bank has pointed out that the bRic will the group to watch out for. all the countries are rapidly going the capitalistic path and in turn are enjoying it's 
dividends.russia has been rapidly upgrading it's armed forces and NATO has even warned that by 2020, 80% of it's weapons systems will be modernised. 
you see where i am getting at.your days are numbered.
you see you may think that us is a nation with foreign policy based on morals and all that , but records prove something else. it is a cruel country. people , nations resent you and are scared of you.
i don't think that is good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fellows try to think three dimensionally. sure , no doubt the united snakes has better technology, has better weapon system AT THE MOMENT.but  what is the underlying thing that makes it all work.MONEY. for the last 200 years they have been the richest nation and that money (part of it)went into funding high tech weapon systems.the russians even during the cold war just could not keep up with the expenditure.they failed as a nation not because of social unrest( that was the secondary reason) but because their government ran out of money. PERENNIAL TECHNOLOGICAL SUPERIORITY which most of you are automatically banking on is certainly not guaranteed. if a nation has enough resources sooner or later it will match up to you.you see technology percolates very fast and you can&#8217;t really seal it.look at india , china , and hell even russia. they are managing to pull out some really impressive stuff despite shoe string budgets.all that stuff about russia following the wrong strategy and that you have all the brains , keep forgetting that under the situation that possibly was the only viable strategy. they produce cheap stuff ,coz that&#8217;s all they could afford.<br />
so the question to be asked is this .will US always maintain this financial edge?<br />
you know the answer to that question.<br />
WORLD BANK- your own world bank has pointed out that the bRic will the group to watch out for. all the countries are rapidly going the capitalistic path and in turn are enjoying it&#8217;s<br />
dividends.russia has been rapidly upgrading it&#8217;s armed forces and NATO has even warned that by 2020, 80% of it&#8217;s weapons systems will be modernised.<br />
you see where i am getting at.your days are numbered.<br />
you see you may think that us is a nation with foreign policy based on morals and all that , but records prove something else. it is a cruel country. people , nations resent you and are scared of you.<br />
i don&#8217;t think that is good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The British Accuracy International AS50 BMG Sniper Rifle by Madmajor-896</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/the-british-accuracy-international-as50-bmg-sniper-rifle#comment-7340</link>
		<dc:creator>Madmajor-896</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/the-british-accuracy-international-as50-bmg-sniper-rifle#comment-7340</guid>
		<description>AS50's effective range &#62; M107's effective range</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AS50&#8217;s effective range &gt; M107&#8217;s effective range</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Fighter Jet in the World - Best Combat Jet in World by yujie</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/best-fighter-jet-in-the-world-best-combat-jet-in-world#comment-7329</link>
		<dc:creator>yujie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/best-fighter-jet-in-the-world-best-combat-jet-in-world#comment-7329</guid>
		<description>both f-22 and su-37 has vectoring thrust but the raptor has stealth better radar and weapons</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>both f-22 and su-37 has vectoring thrust but the raptor has stealth better radar and weapons</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Metal Storm - Future Weapons Breakthrough Technology - 1 million rounds per minute! by Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/metal-storm-future-weapons-breakthrough-technology-1-million-rounds-per-minute#comment-7324</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/metal-storm-future-weapons-breakthrough-technology-1-million-rounds-per-minute#comment-7324</guid>
		<description>it may be aussie made but its american funded and owned</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it may be aussie made but its american funded and owned</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on F-22 Raptor&#8217;s Impressive Maneuverability by stony</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/f-22-raptors-impressive-maneuverability#comment-7305</link>
		<dc:creator>stony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/f-22-raptors-impressive-maneuverability#comment-7305</guid>
		<description>Hay guys, the 22 is a first look, first kill acft. By the time any acft can lock-on to the 22 he will be able to see it, and the 22 will have a lock-on way before that. The only thing ANY acft will see on radar is when the side or mwb door opening then close and of course the missle!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hay guys, the 22 is a first look, first kill acft. By the time any acft can lock-on to the 22 he will be able to see it, and the 22 will have a lock-on way before that. The only thing ANY acft will see on radar is when the side or mwb door opening then close and of course the missle!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Best Fighter Jet in the World - Best Combat Jet in World by mw</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/best-fighter-jet-in-the-world-best-combat-jet-in-world#comment-7302</link>
		<dc:creator>mw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/best-fighter-jet-in-the-world-best-combat-jet-in-world#comment-7302</guid>
		<description>Its so funny that you yanks always think that your stuff is the best, unfortunately at this present time the Eurofighter has been prooved to be the best muiltiroll fighter jet in the world, here are just a few quotes from the internet,,In 2004, United States Air Force Chief of Staff General John P. Jumper said after flying the Eurofighter:I have flown all the air force jets. None was as good as the Eurofighter.,,,In 2005, a trainer Eurofighter T1 was reported to have had a chance encounter the previous year with two U.S. Air Force F-15Es over the Lake District in the north of England. The encounter became a mock dogfight with the Eurofighter allegedly emerging victorious,,,,In the 2005 Singapore evaluation, the Typhoon won all three combat tests, including one in which a single Typhoon defeated three RSAF F-16s, and reliably completed all planned flight tests.[119][120][verification needed] Singapore still went on to buy the F-15 due to uncertainty over Typhoon tranche 2 delivery dates.,,,During the exercise "Typhoon Meet" held in 2008, Eurofighters flew against F/A-18 Hornets, Mirage F1s, Harriers and F-16s in a mock combat exercise. It is claimed that the Eurofighters won all engagements (even outnumbered 8 vs 27) without suffering losses.,,there is also a story circulating that there was a certain meeting in America between 2xEurofighters and 2xF22s and the American military decided to censor it because they were embarrassed that there top plane lost,,,also every one knows the F22 is not so stealthy as people think</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its so funny that you yanks always think that your stuff is the best, unfortunately at this present time the Eurofighter has been prooved to be the best muiltiroll fighter jet in the world, here are just a few quotes from the internet,,In 2004, United States Air Force Chief of Staff General John P. Jumper said after flying the Eurofighter:I have flown all the air force jets. None was as good as the Eurofighter.,,,In 2005, a trainer Eurofighter T1 was reported to have had a chance encounter the previous year with two U.S. Air Force F-15Es over the Lake District in the north of England. The encounter became a mock dogfight with the Eurofighter allegedly emerging victorious,,,,In the 2005 Singapore evaluation, the Typhoon won all three combat tests, including one in which a single Typhoon defeated three RSAF F-16s, and reliably completed all planned flight tests.[119][120][verification needed] Singapore still went on to buy the F-15 due to uncertainty over Typhoon tranche 2 delivery dates.,,,During the exercise &#8220;Typhoon Meet&#8221; held in 2008, Eurofighters flew against F/A-18 Hornets, Mirage F1s, Harriers and F-16s in a mock combat exercise. It is claimed that the Eurofighters won all engagements (even outnumbered 8 vs 27) without suffering losses.,,there is also a story circulating that there was a certain meeting in America between 2xEurofighters and 2xF22s and the American military decided to censor it because they were embarrassed that there top plane lost,,,also every one knows the F22 is not so stealthy as people think</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on M4 - M4A1 Carbine - Modern Warfare by infantry</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/m4-m4a1-carbine-modern-weapons#comment-7294</link>
		<dc:creator>infantry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/m4-m4a1-carbine-modern-weapons#comment-7294</guid>
		<description>the M4 is a good weapon but the problem with it is that the small parts that piece it together clog to easily creating your weapon to jam, plus it has no stopping power so you have to shoot your enemy multiple times inoder for them to go down</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the M4 is a good weapon but the problem with it is that the small parts that piece it together clog to easily creating your weapon to jam, plus it has no stopping power so you have to shoot your enemy multiple times inoder for them to go down</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Our Visitors by Bob36</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/useronline#comment-7279</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob36</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/useronline/#comment-7279</guid>
		<description>They   suggest that this null hypothesis has withstood all attempts to reject   it. ,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They   suggest that this null hypothesis has withstood all attempts to reject   it. ,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on M4 - M4A1 Carbine - Modern Warfare by ARMYman1984</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/m4-m4a1-carbine-modern-weapons#comment-7274</link>
		<dc:creator>ARMYman1984</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/m4-m4a1-carbine-modern-weapons#comment-7274</guid>
		<description>I have shot the M4A1 carbine many times it has shown to be very good wepon. so is the M16A2. i shot them both a lot in Iraq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have shot the M4A1 carbine many times it has shown to be very good wepon. so is the M16A2. i shot them both a lot in Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The British Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank - British innovation in armored vehicles tested in Iraq by bexiii</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/the-british-challenger-2-main-battle-tank-british-innovation-in-armored-vehicles-tested-in-iraq#comment-7251</link>
		<dc:creator>bexiii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/the-british-challenger-2-main-battle-tank-british-innovation-in-armored-vehicles-tested-in-iraq#comment-7251</guid>
		<description>Tanks of World War II 
The armoured vehicle listings are primarily organized by country of origin. Over 200 tanks listed have detailed and standardized specifications of armor protection, fire-power, mobility and general information.while heavy armer and all-terrain  mobility provide protection for the tank and its crew, allowing it to perform all primary tasks of the armoured troops on the battlefield. Tanks were first made by the French,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tanks of World War II<br />
The armoured vehicle listings are primarily organized by country of origin. Over 200 tanks listed have detailed and standardized specifications of armor protection, fire-power, mobility and general information.while heavy armer and all-terrain  mobility provide protection for the tank and its crew, allowing it to perform all primary tasks of the armoured troops on the battlefield. Tanks were first made by the French,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chinese Type 99 Tank - Newest Armor of China by jamieriase</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/chinese-type-99-tank-newest-armor-of-china#comment-7242</link>
		<dc:creator>jamieriase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/chinese-type-99-tank-newest-armor-of-china#comment-7242</guid>
		<description>its time to let the japanese rearm and rebuild their navy-why should the u.s. continue to subsidize the protection of the japanese home islands. We have enough on our plate now to deal with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its time to let the japanese rearm and rebuild their navy-why should the u.s. continue to subsidize the protection of the japanese home islands. We have enough on our plate now to deal with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on X-51 Hypersonic Cruise Missile - Fastest Cruise Missile by India: Tinkering With Hypersonic Missiles - Page 14 - Defence Forum Of India &#124; DFI &#124;</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/x-51-hypersonic-cruise-missile-fastest-cruise-missile#comment-7241</link>
		<dc:creator>India: Tinkering With Hypersonic Missiles - Page 14 - Defence Forum Of India &#124; DFI &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/x-51-hypersonic-cruise-missile-fastest-cruise-missile#comment-7241</guid>
		<description>[...] X-51 Hypersonic Cruise Missile - Fastest Cruise Missile  X-51 Hypersonic Cruise Missile - Fastest Cruise Missile  Imagine having the ability to strike anywhere in the world within one hour. The X-51 is an amazing hypersonic cruise missile that travels 600 miles in just ten minutes (approximately 3600 MPH or Mach 5).    Compared with the Tomahawk Missile which travels at a mere 550 MPH, the X51 gives the US the ability to strike enemies quickly before they can evade. As U.S. Strategic Command&#8217;s deputy commander Lt. Gen. C. Robert Kehler puts it, the goal of the X51 is &#8220;to strike virtually anywhere on the face of the Earth within 60 minutes.&#8221;  The power of this weapon once it reaches its unfortunate target is amazing.   Traveling as fast as 13,000 mph, the warheads are filled with scored tungsten rods with twice the strength of steel. Just above the target, the warheads detonate, showering the area with thousands of rods-each one up to 12 times as destructive as a .50-caliber bullet. Anything within 3000 sq. ft. of this whirling, metallic storm is obliterated.  The X-51 Will be the most advanced cruise / long distance missile in the world when it is completed, although there have been protests that the X-51 could trigger a nuclear war. A test run of this weapon in 2008 could appear to be heading toward another nuclear power during portions of its flight pattern which could be provoking. More about this concept can be read at Popular Mechanics     __________________ America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people. George W. Bush State of the Union Address, January 2004 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] X-51 Hypersonic Cruise Missile - Fastest Cruise Missile  X-51 Hypersonic Cruise Missile - Fastest Cruise Missile  Imagine having the ability to strike anywhere in the world within one hour. The X-51 is an amazing hypersonic cruise missile that travels 600 miles in just ten minutes (approximately 3600 MPH or Mach 5).    Compared with the Tomahawk Missile which travels at a mere 550 MPH, the X51 gives the US the ability to strike enemies quickly before they can evade. As U.S. Strategic Command&#8217;s deputy commander Lt. Gen. C. Robert Kehler puts it, the goal of the X51 is &#8220;to strike virtually anywhere on the face of the Earth within 60 minutes.&#8221;  The power of this weapon once it reaches its unfortunate target is amazing.   Traveling as fast as 13,000 mph, the warheads are filled with scored tungsten rods with twice the strength of steel. Just above the target, the warheads detonate, showering the area with thousands of rods-each one up to 12 times as destructive as a .50-caliber bullet. Anything within 3000 sq. ft. of this whirling, metallic storm is obliterated.  The X-51 Will be the most advanced cruise / long distance missile in the world when it is completed, although there have been protests that the X-51 could trigger a nuclear war. A test run of this weapon in 2008 could appear to be heading toward another nuclear power during portions of its flight pattern which could be provoking. More about this concept can be read at Popular Mechanics     __________________ America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people. George W. Bush State of the Union Address, January 2004 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CheyTac Intervention M200 Sniper Rifle - .408 Caliber by warfare</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/shooter-movie-cheytac-intervention-m200-sniper-rifle#comment-7239</link>
		<dc:creator>warfare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/shooter-movie-cheytac-intervention-m200-sniper-rifle#comment-7239</guid>
		<description>The barrett is the M99 which is the only bolt action barrett</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The barrett is the M99 which is the only bolt action barrett</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chinese Military Weapons - Technology of the PLA by Harry</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/chinese-military-weapons-technology-of-the-pla#comment-7231</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/chinese-military-weapons-technology-of-the-pla#comment-7231</guid>
		<description>The Chinese are a growing superpower, there is no doubt. Their military is indeed growing considerably in power and so it should. Despite the official communist government, China and many affluent cities are more capatalist than ever. Its army is not as technologically advanced as other Western nations but it is still a force to be reckoned with. A country as large as China needs a capable military. And with the shadow of the USA and Russia over it, China doesn't want to be left behind. The invasion of the Japanese in WWII have left their mark on Chinese history. Is strength a crime?

The USA thinks of itself as the wrold police poking its nose into everything it can. China has learnt the smart option which is to mind its own business. In the end, war is expensive. Yes, China does have many faults and crimes to ammend for, but what right do western countries have to judge China? Also, the Chinese have realised that destroying the USA is a stupid idea. Why bother when you can make money out of them and sell them cheap shit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Chinese are a growing superpower, there is no doubt. Their military is indeed growing considerably in power and so it should. Despite the official communist government, China and many affluent cities are more capatalist than ever. Its army is not as technologically advanced as other Western nations but it is still a force to be reckoned with. A country as large as China needs a capable military. And with the shadow of the USA and Russia over it, China doesn&#8217;t want to be left behind. The invasion of the Japanese in WWII have left their mark on Chinese history. Is strength a crime?</p>
<p>The USA thinks of itself as the wrold police poking its nose into everything it can. China has learnt the smart option which is to mind its own business. In the end, war is expensive. Yes, China does have many faults and crimes to ammend for, but what right do western countries have to judge China? Also, the Chinese have realised that destroying the USA is a stupid idea. Why bother when you can make money out of them and sell them cheap shit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chinese Military Video - Peoples Liberation Army - PLA by ffddff</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/the-chinese-military-the-peoples-liberation-army-pla#comment-7228</link>
		<dc:creator>ffddff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 02:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/military/the-chinese-military-the-peoples-liberation-army-pla/#comment-7228</guid>
		<description>Even with a grenade machine gun, you are not going to get everyone of those twenty guys, and all it take is one of them to fire a single shot to get you. This is not the matrix.

And then guess what, your grenade machine gun will be theirs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even with a grenade machine gun, you are not going to get everyone of those twenty guys, and all it take is one of them to fire a single shot to get you. This is not the matrix.</p>
<p>And then guess what, your grenade machine gun will be theirs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chinese Military Weapons - Technology of the PLA by ffddff</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/chinese-military-weapons-technology-of-the-pla#comment-7227</link>
		<dc:creator>ffddff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 02:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/chinese-military-weapons-technology-of-the-pla#comment-7227</guid>
		<description>Firstly, the chinese were not huns, you got them mixed up. Secondly, the chinese people are more diverse then you think, because during their history many people have camed and settled (without discrimination if they don't make trouble) - that they are really more diverse like the american people  

Thirdly, racist people are everywhere, by generalizing and saying every member of a group are racist, you have proved that you yourself is racist.

People keep poking the dragon in the ass and then wonder where that fire came from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firstly, the chinese were not huns, you got them mixed up. Secondly, the chinese people are more diverse then you think, because during their history many people have camed and settled (without discrimination if they don&#8217;t make trouble) - that they are really more diverse like the american people  </p>
<p>Thirdly, racist people are everywhere, by generalizing and saying every member of a group are racist, you have proved that you yourself is racist.</p>
<p>People keep poking the dragon in the ass and then wonder where that fire came from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chinese Type 99 Tank - Newest Armor of China by ffddff</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/chinese-type-99-tank-newest-armor-of-china#comment-7226</link>
		<dc:creator>ffddff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/chinese-type-99-tank-newest-armor-of-china#comment-7226</guid>
		<description>Omar does have a point,

Rssians help absorbed german advantages in WWII, just as chinese helped absorbed Japanese military in the same war. As any historian can tell you, 80% of all japanese army is in china in WWII. The best troops were basically in china, americans mainly fight with japanese navy and naval airforce, as well as occasional land force stationed in islands/around philippines etc but they are low in numbers compared to fightings on the mainland.

During the 8 year resistance with japan:

The Kuomintang fought in 22 major engagements, most of which involved more than 100,000 troops on both sides, 1,171 minor engagements most of which involved more than 50,000 troops on both sides, and 38,931 skirmishes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Omar does have a point,</p>
<p>Rssians help absorbed german advantages in WWII, just as chinese helped absorbed Japanese military in the same war. As any historian can tell you, 80% of all japanese army is in china in WWII. The best troops were basically in china, americans mainly fight with japanese navy and naval airforce, as well as occasional land force stationed in islands/around philippines etc but they are low in numbers compared to fightings on the mainland.</p>
<p>During the 8 year resistance with japan:</p>
<p>The Kuomintang fought in 22 major engagements, most of which involved more than 100,000 troops on both sides, 1,171 minor engagements most of which involved more than 50,000 troops on both sides, and 38,931 skirmishes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.076 seconds -->
