Comments for Future Military Weapon Technology - Future Firepower http://www.futurefirepower.com The Newest Military Weapon Systems Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:57:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 Comment on Russian Tank Forces - T90 Technology by shani http://www.futurefirepower.com/russian-tank-forces-t90-technology#comment-4106 shani Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:13:48 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/?p=186#comment-4106 maybe of maybe not USA may win or may not win russia we could is the only nation with the least weapon superiority which could atleast stand against USA so we could talk about this when a 3rd world war starts maybe of maybe not
USA may win or may not win
russia we could is the only nation with the least weapon superiority which could atleast stand against USA so we could talk about this when a 3rd world war starts

]]> Comment on MGL M32 - Multiple Grenade Launcher by Ray http://www.futurefirepower.com/mgl-m32-multiple-grenade-launcher#comment-4059 Ray Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:54:31 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/mgl-m32-multiple-grenade-launcher#comment-4059 Great weapon, the only draw back is the 15 pound trigger pull. Effective range approximately 400 meters. Will absolutely destroy a multiple story house, and as Brian said pretty much everything else. Great weapon, the only draw back is the 15 pound trigger pull.
Effective range approximately 400 meters. Will absolutely destroy
a multiple story house, and as Brian said pretty much everything else.

]]> Comment on German Leopard 2 Main Battle Tank by BigDaddy http://www.futurefirepower.com/german-leopard-2-main-battle-tank#comment-4058 BigDaddy Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:06:42 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/german-leopard-2-main-battle-tank#comment-4058 I know that the LeClerc is meant to have very good computer networking technology that allows great communication between tanks - both voice and data. Unlike the M1-A1, that had to have networking added after the fact, the LeClerc was built with this in mind. Keep in mind that of all the Western tanks, the LeClerc is the newest design and benefits from that. I know that the LeClerc is meant to have very good computer networking technology that allows great communication between tanks - both voice and data. Unlike the M1-A1, that had to have networking added after the fact, the LeClerc was built with this in mind. Keep in mind that of all the Western tanks, the LeClerc is the newest design and benefits from that.

]]> Comment on Chinese Type 99 Tank - Newest Armor of China by O'conner http://www.futurefirepower.com/chinese-type-99-tank-newest-armor-of-china#comment-4057 O'conner Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:47:59 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/chinese-type-99-tank-newest-armor-of-china#comment-4057 you are all retards the marines suck and are over rated, amercia is losing in there wars. Its the end of amercia, history always repeats its self the soviet union invade afganastan and there contry failed. this will happen to the usa, and plus quanty is better than quality remmber ww2 3 shermans to take down 1 tiger. but there were more shermans than tigers you are all retards the marines suck and are over rated, amercia is losing in there wars. Its the end of amercia, history always repeats its self the soviet union invade afganastan and there contry failed. this will happen to the usa, and plus quanty is better than quality remmber ww2 3 shermans to take down 1 tiger. but there were more shermans than tigers

]]> Comment on Chinese Military Weapons - Technology of the PLA by Wu Sheng Chin http://www.futurefirepower.com/chinese-military-weapons-technology-of-the-pla#comment-4047 Wu Sheng Chin Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:08:43 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/chinese-military-weapons-technology-of-the-pla#comment-4047 If any American cares to turn back the pages of his history he will find out the US has been involved in most of the major wars since 1945. Korea,vietnam ,bosnia,Kosovo,Iraq to name those I know.Well the US didn't get involved in the recent Georgia war because the logstics were not in their favour. Furhtermore it was Russia not a weak Middle East country like Iraq that can be pushed around. Of course if the US really want it could win but at the cost of a general war which is not worth the price. If the American people are not careful,their leaders could suck them into war on the pretext of defending US armed forces.If readers care to read about the Tonkin incident they will find out it was manufactured to give Johnson the pretext to attack North vietna,m. 58000 US youth lost their lives. I'm afraid that in the Taiwan scenario, an ac could be sacrificed to start a war with China. Just imagine 5000 innocent lives lost because the US president wants to destroy China.Of course it aint easy and straight forward. The PLA must be prepared and bf China is almost pulverised they inflict unacceptable damage on the US. Fortuantely I believe that saner heads will prevail in the Pentagon and such a scenario is a remote possibility.The point is the US can't attack China without being hit like in the 1954 and 1958 Taiwan crisis. Then Mao's army was poorly equipped and at most could sink a few US ships. FF to 2008 it's a different story and the amount of havoc the pla can wreak on the US homeland will increase even with the missile shield,Ineed not say China will be a pile smoke. If any American cares to turn back the pages of his history he will find out the US has been involved in most of the major wars since 1945. Korea,vietnam ,bosnia,Kosovo,Iraq to name those I know.Well the US didn’t get involved in the recent Georgia war because the logstics were not in their favour. Furhtermore it was Russia not a weak Middle East country like Iraq that can be pushed around. Of course if the US really want it could win but at the cost of a general war which is not worth the price.
If the American people are not careful,their leaders could suck them into war on the pretext of defending US armed forces.If readers care to read about the Tonkin incident they will find out it was manufactured to give Johnson the pretext to attack North vietna,m. 58000 US youth lost their lives.
I’m afraid that in the Taiwan scenario, an ac could be sacrificed to start a war with China. Just imagine 5000 innocent lives lost because the US president wants to destroy China.Of course it aint easy and straight forward. The PLA must be prepared and bf China is almost pulverised they inflict unacceptable damage on the US.
Fortuantely I believe that saner heads will prevail in the Pentagon and such a scenario is a remote possibility.The point is the US can’t attack China without being hit like in the 1954 and 1958 Taiwan crisis. Then Mao’s army was poorly equipped and at most could sink a few US ships. FF to 2008 it’s a different story and the amount of havoc the pla can wreak on the US homeland will increase even with the missile shield,Ineed not say China will be a pile smoke.

]]> Comment on When the Biggest is Just not Big Enough… The Ford Class Aircraft Carrier by JT http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough#comment-4034 JT Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:36:46 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough#comment-4034 The soviet carriers are really kind of lame, on top of the fact that they are extremely old models and are very vulnerable to sub and surface attack, they are also relatively slow compared to actually speed of our carriers, they have no catapult which gives their aircraft a lower survivability on take off, and makes them use more fuel. Plus the strike group with US carriers make them the most formidable force in the world, with the ability to completely annihilate many countries and a carrying capacity larger than many countries aircraft their is no doubt the Ford class carriers will be the finest ship to ever sail the sea. The soviet carriers are really kind of lame, on top of the fact that they are extremely old models and are very vulnerable to sub and surface attack, they are also relatively slow compared to actually speed of our carriers, they have no catapult which gives their aircraft a lower survivability on take off, and makes them use more fuel. Plus the strike group with US carriers make them the most formidable force in the world, with the ability to completely annihilate many countries and a carrying capacity larger than many countries aircraft their is no doubt the Ford class carriers will be the finest ship to ever sail the sea.

]]> Comment on Chinese Military Weapons - Technology of the PLA by Casey http://www.futurefirepower.com/chinese-military-weapons-technology-of-the-pla#comment-4006 Casey Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:14:18 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/chinese-military-weapons-technology-of-the-pla#comment-4006 I'm sorry, we are the only current super power, people have already attacked for our ideals, we have had nothing but problems with communism in the past. Yeah your right, we should not worry when the only country in the world that can put forth a million man army increaseases enough defense funding to cover that. Idiot. I’m sorry, we are the only current super power, people have already attacked for our ideals, we have had nothing but problems with communism in the past. Yeah your right, we should not worry when the only country in the world that can put forth a million man army increaseases enough defense funding to cover that. Idiot.

]]> Comment on CheyTac Intervention M200 Sniper Rifle - .408 Caliber by Денис http://www.futurefirepower.com/shooter-movie-cheytac-intervention-m200-sniper-rifle#comment-3987 Денис Sun, 16 Nov 2008 20:30:36 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/shooter-movie-cheytac-intervention-m200-sniper-rifle#comment-3987 Вот это оружие!!!! где его можно купить??? Вот это оружие!!!! где его можно купить???

]]> Comment on Barrett M107 Sniper Rifle - Future Weapons video by blind shooter http://www.futurefirepower.com/the-barrett-m107-bmg-50-caliber-sniper-rifle-future-weapons-video#comment-3958 blind shooter Sat, 15 Nov 2008 23:25:07 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/the-barrett-m107-bmg-50-caliber-sniper-rifle-future-weapons-video#comment-3958 My brother has an Armalite, I have a Barret and I can say it doesn;t take 15 to 20 secs to reload. It will take that long to someone to get their hearing back if the don't have ear protection My brother has an Armalite, I have a Barret and I can say it doesn;t take 15 to 20 secs to reload. It will take that long to someone to get their hearing back if the don’t have ear protection

]]> Comment on Chinese Military Weapons - Technology of the PLA by Will http://www.futurefirepower.com/chinese-military-weapons-technology-of-the-pla#comment-3905 Will Fri, 14 Nov 2008 04:23:04 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/chinese-military-weapons-technology-of-the-pla#comment-3905 I think this highlights the hypocrisy of the Americans. The Chinese are merely spending 10% of what US spends on military and yet it is the Chinese who are being painted as villains for even daring to think of upping its spending to half of what the US is spending. I think this highlights the hypocrisy of the Americans. The Chinese are merely spending 10% of what US spends on military and yet it is the Chinese who are being painted as villains for even daring to think of upping its spending to half of what the US is spending.

]]> Comment on F-22 Raptor at Farnborough, UK by Don Veto http://www.futurefirepower.com/f-22-raptor-at-farnborough-uk#comment-3886 Don Veto Thu, 13 Nov 2008 05:10:01 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/?p=237#comment-3886 ANY BODY CAN HELP ME? i'M NOT A TERRORIST. i LOVE LIFE. i JUST WANT TO EXPERIENCE AND RIDE ANY SUPERSONIC JETS. i WANT TO EXPERIENCE THE SONIC BOOM. aND IF GOD ALLOW ME, I WILL HIJACK A FIGHTERJET AND FLY BY MYSELF EVEN IF I GET 20 YEARS IN JAIL! i AM A FIGHTER JET INTHUSIAST ANY BODY CAN HELP ME? i’M NOT A TERRORIST. i LOVE LIFE. i JUST WANT TO EXPERIENCE AND RIDE ANY SUPERSONIC JETS. i WANT TO EXPERIENCE THE SONIC BOOM. aND IF GOD ALLOW ME, I WILL HIJACK A FIGHTERJET AND FLY BY MYSELF EVEN IF I GET 20 YEARS IN JAIL! i AM A FIGHTER JET INTHUSIAST

]]> Comment on M230 Chain Gun - Apache Attack Weapon by William http://www.futurefirepower.com/m230-chain-gun-apache-attack-weapon#comment-3814 William Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:19:47 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/m230-chain-gun-apache-attack-weapon#comment-3814 WOW, they should make a video game that lets you do that :D That is amazing. They're just walking when (obliteration) Check out the archer artillary system.... WOW, they should make a video game that lets you do that :D

That is amazing. They’re just walking when (obliteration)

Check out the archer artillary system….

]]> Comment on CBU-105 - The Sensor-Fuzed Weapon - CBU-97 Cluster Bomb Video by MIRAJ http://www.futurefirepower.com/the-sensor-fused-weapon-cbu-97-cluster-bomb-video#comment-3796 MIRAJ Mon, 10 Nov 2008 05:23:33 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/military-weapons-vehicles/the-sensor-fused-weapon-cbu-97-cluster-bomb-video/#comment-3796 can u please make this video available. otherwise can u plz mail it on my ID? can u please make this video available.
otherwise can u plz mail it on my ID?

]]> Comment on F-22 Raptor at Farnborough, UK by jayant sahal http://www.futurefirepower.com/f-22-raptor-at-farnborough-uk#comment-3743 jayant sahal Sat, 08 Nov 2008 08:13:03 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/?p=237#comment-3743 I am heard about the American tank ,i forgot it name but that is advance one and its specialization is it will climbed up at 60 degree . please give me the information about it I am heard about the American tank ,i forgot it name but that is advance one and its specialization is it will climbed up at 60 degree . please give me the information about it

]]> Comment on Best Fighter Jet in the World - Best Combat Jet in World by Michael Mosco Kizito http://www.futurefirepower.com/best-fighter-jet-in-the-world-best-combat-jet-in-world#comment-3668 Michael Mosco Kizito Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:27:24 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/best-fighter-jet-in-the-world-best-combat-jet-in-world#comment-3668 Its interesting to note that most comments here are emotional and not logical.i have on quite a no. of ocassions listened to fighter pilots and technological advances not underestimated,they say that up in the air its the pilot that matters most.i would love to hear from someone who has technical expertise on both the su-37,and the f-22. thanks. Its interesting to note that most comments here are emotional and not logical.i have on quite a no. of ocassions listened to fighter pilots and technological advances not underestimated,they say that up in the air its the pilot that matters most.i would love to hear from someone who has technical expertise on both the su-37,and the f-22.
thanks.

]]> Comment on Barrett REC7 - M468 - Future Assault Rifle by Dan http://www.futurefirepower.com/barrett-rec7-m468-future-assault-rifle#comment-3652 Dan Wed, 05 Nov 2008 22:48:49 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/barrett-rec7-m468-future-assault-rifle#comment-3652 My god, some of your comments are really amusing. Especially the first few. Aaanyway, the biggest issue with 5.56 rounds is that they simply do NOT have the stopping power. I was in New Zealand Army infantry, using the steyr AUG, and it simply was too small to do any serious damage. Many a time i wished i had something of at least 7.62 cal. Considering the 7.62 is available pretty much worldwide, and that it is the favoured round of terrorists and anyone with an AK (which just so happens to be the most successful assault rifle in history) then you'd want to be hitting back with at least the same calibre, if not greater. in vietnam, GI's were shooting 5.56 rounds that simply went through the enemy, didn't knock them down straight away, which gave them the opportunity to shoot back with much gruntier 7.62's. That'll put a decent sized hole in you. The 5.56 just wont. Weapons platforms of today should definitely take into account recoil reduction, accuracy, simple and quick modification, and reliability. How great would it be if you could have a lightweight rifle that you can use for close quarters, then modify within seconds to drop a target out at, say, 6-700 yards? I'd buy one in a heartbeat My god, some of your comments are really amusing. Especially the first few. Aaanyway, the biggest issue with 5.56 rounds is that they simply do NOT have the stopping power. I was in New Zealand Army infantry, using the steyr AUG, and it simply was too small to do any serious damage. Many a time i wished i had something of at least 7.62 cal. Considering the 7.62 is available pretty much worldwide, and that it is the favoured round of terrorists and anyone with an AK (which just so happens to be the most successful assault rifle in history) then you’d want to be hitting back with at least the same calibre, if not greater.

in vietnam, GI’s were shooting 5.56 rounds that simply went through the enemy, didn’t knock them down straight away, which gave them the opportunity to shoot back with much gruntier 7.62’s. That’ll put a decent sized hole in you. The 5.56 just wont.

Weapons platforms of today should definitely take into account recoil reduction, accuracy, simple and quick modification, and reliability. How great would it be if you could have a lightweight rifle that you can use for close quarters, then modify within seconds to drop a target out at, say, 6-700 yards? I’d buy one in a heartbeat

]]> Comment on Best Fighter Jet in the World - Best Combat Jet in World by jojo http://www.futurefirepower.com/best-fighter-jet-in-the-world-best-combat-jet-in-world#comment-3640 jojo Wed, 05 Nov 2008 12:59:31 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/best-fighter-jet-in-the-world-best-combat-jet-in-world#comment-3640 congrats barrack obama being the next president of the usa congrats barrack obama being the next president of the usa

]]> Comment on Best Fighter Jet in the World - Best Combat Jet in World by jojo http://www.futurefirepower.com/best-fighter-jet-in-the-world-best-combat-jet-in-world#comment-3639 jojo Wed, 05 Nov 2008 12:57:22 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/best-fighter-jet-in-the-world-best-combat-jet-in-world#comment-3639 with out a doubt, f22 is the best fighter plane in the 21st century.. russia and china is suck........... f22 can kill 6 su 37 in 1 min.. thats cool with out a doubt, f22 is the best fighter plane in the 21st century.. russia and china is suck……….. f22 can kill 6 su 37 in 1 min.. thats cool

]]> Comment on Touch Screen Battlefield Technology in HD by Ephedra liquid gel products. http://www.futurefirepower.com/touch-screen-battlefield-technology-in-hd#comment-3632 Ephedra liquid gel products. Wed, 05 Nov 2008 07:45:34 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/touch-screen-battlefield-technology-in-hd#comment-3632 <strong>Ephedra....</strong> Products containing ephedra.... Ephedra….

Products containing ephedra….

]]> Comment on Ballistic Missile Submarines - Ohio Class Sub by sdgfds http://www.futurefirepower.com/ballistic-missile-submarines-ohio-class-sub#comment-3550 sdgfds Sat, 01 Nov 2008 10:35:46 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/ballistic-missile-submarines-ohio-class-sub#comment-3550 rtfeyrty rtfeyrty

]]> Comment on Bomb Iran Plan by paddy http://www.futurefirepower.com/bomb-iran-plan#comment-3545 paddy Sat, 01 Nov 2008 05:36:44 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/bomb-iran-plan#comment-3545 "An american quoting international" law (under International Law, he who uses human shields is culpable for their deaths) you wingless and the rest of you america are a joke... going around waving your big stick at every one... you should get out more and see the world and meet the people not just bomb the country and kill the people....over 1 million men,woman and children killed in Iraq.... how can you live with that.....??? america is ment to be shining light of the free world.... setting good exanples..... to middle east and the rest of the world.....Getting back to international law i am postive that there is some thing in there about invading another country..... like the other day when america attacked in side Syria boarder and a number of time in Pakistans boarder.OH. its ok you are fighting a war on terror..... or come on, it is a war for oil and power... Why did you invade iraq...??? with out the UNs backing... that right the " coalition of the willing " all the country that you have in your back pocket..... giving then aid or weapon tec. my country being one of then AUSTRALIA.... yes Australia we some how got sucked into your war.... maybe it was weapon tec or free trade who knows.... The world is changing in 10-15 year the world is going to be very diffrent.... no matter how many country you invade or how many people you bomb the sleeping giant is waking up and becoming very good friends with russia.... you will lose you power... and than you will have wished that you were a bit nicer to others.... it is how the world works "what go around come around" “An american quoting international” law (under International Law, he who uses human shields is culpable for their deaths) you wingless and the rest of you america are a joke… going around waving your big stick at every one… you should get out more and see the world and meet the people not just bomb the country and kill the people….over 1 million men,woman and children killed in Iraq…. how can you live with that…..??? america is ment to be shining light of the free world…. setting good exanples….. to middle east and the rest of the world…..Getting back to international law i am postive that there is some thing in there about invading another country….. like the other day when america attacked in side Syria boarder and a number of time in Pakistans boarder.OH. its ok you are fighting a war on terror….. or come on, it is a war for oil and power… Why did you invade iraq…??? with out the UNs backing… that right the ” coalition of the willing ” all the country that you have in your back pocket….. giving then aid or weapon tec. my country being one of then AUSTRALIA…. yes Australia we some how got sucked into your war…. maybe it was weapon tec or free trade who knows…. The world is changing in 10-15 year the world is going to be very diffrent…. no matter how many country you invade or how many people you bomb the sleeping giant is waking up and becoming very good friends with russia….
you will lose you power… and than you will have wished that you were a bit nicer to others…. it is how the world works “what go around come around”

]]> Comment on X-51 Hypersonic Cruise Missile - Fastest Cruise Missile by Kanye East http://www.futurefirepower.com/x-51-hypersonic-cruise-missile-fastest-cruise-missile#comment-3522 Kanye East Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:10:16 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/x-51-hypersonic-cruise-missile-fastest-cruise-missile#comment-3522 This sounds like a emense inprovement to the existing Tomahawk cruise missile. What gives me chills and probally the enemy too is that fact that it can strike anywhere in under a hour. The fact that it can travel over 13000 miles per hour is crazy. Thats faster than mach 10. This could just be one of our most destructive missiles yet. Russia has no chance to defend against this or any other super power in the world This sounds like a emense inprovement to the existing Tomahawk cruise missile. What gives me chills and probally the enemy too is that fact that it can strike anywhere in under a hour. The fact that it can travel over 13000 miles per hour is crazy. Thats faster than mach 10. This could just be one of our most destructive missiles yet. Russia has no chance to defend against this or any other super power in the world

]]> Comment on Best Fighter Jet in the World - Best Combat Jet in World by Roger http://www.futurefirepower.com/best-fighter-jet-in-the-world-best-combat-jet-in-world#comment-3509 Roger Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:51:46 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/best-fighter-jet-in-the-world-best-combat-jet-in-world#comment-3509 I think this is an interesting topic but it seems most people really haven't checked up on the capabilities of the aircraft they champion compared to other aircrafts. The Typhoon is an excellent aircraft as well as the Rafale and others but to compare them to a Raptor is really not worth doing. The Raptor has the tightest turn radius of any fighter aircraft and the most powerful radar as well as thrust to weight ratio but that is not what makes it more dominant. That would only make it an air superiority fighter and that is not what a Raptor is. The Raptor is an air supremacy fighter which means it was designed to dominate the skies in any theatre, in any climate. In operation Northern Edge (an exercise in Alaska) it flew against F15's, F16's, and F18's and it completely dominated them. I believe the kill ratio the Raptor racked up was 114 to no losses. In it's first debut at Red Flag, I believe it racked up 200 kills to no losses and this was flying against not only US pilots but against Australian, Canadian, British, and other NATO pilots in assorted aircraft. For exact numbers, one can google Northern Edge or Raptors in Red Flag or something similiar. An Australian pilot expressed his frustration at not being able to get any kind of lock (radar or IR) on a Raptor even though he had eyes on the aircraft. The aircraft's systems prevent you from getting a lock on it. This year's Red Flag is suppossed to have British Typhoons for the first time and I believe the Indian Air Force were also invited to bring their Sukhoi's. It'll be interesting to see how well they do. In the end, pilot skills do have a lot to do with air to air engagements and all NATO pilots are similiarly trained and cross train with each other but this aircraft gives such an advantage that it is a scary proposition for any plot to have to fly up against anyone piloting a Raptor. As far as anti stealth radar is concerned, it is a myth. If such an animal exists, it is not radar but works on some other principle. If anyone has any information one this, I would be interested to know about it. I think this is an interesting topic but it seems most people really haven’t checked up on the capabilities of the aircraft they champion compared to other aircrafts. The Typhoon is an excellent aircraft as well as the Rafale and others but to compare them to a Raptor is really not worth doing. The Raptor has the tightest turn radius of any fighter aircraft and the most powerful radar as well as thrust to weight ratio but that is not what makes it more dominant. That would only make it an air superiority fighter and that is not what a Raptor is. The Raptor is an air supremacy fighter which means it was designed to dominate the skies in any theatre, in any climate. In operation Northern Edge (an exercise in Alaska) it flew against F15’s, F16’s, and F18’s and it completely dominated them. I believe the kill ratio the Raptor racked up was 114 to no losses. In it’s first debut at Red Flag, I believe it racked up 200 kills to no losses and this was flying against not only US pilots but against Australian, Canadian, British, and other NATO pilots in assorted aircraft. For exact numbers, one can google Northern Edge or Raptors in Red Flag or something similiar. An Australian pilot expressed his frustration at not being able to get any kind of lock (radar or IR) on a Raptor even though he had eyes on the aircraft. The aircraft’s systems prevent you from getting a lock on it. This year’s Red Flag is suppossed to have British Typhoons for the first time and I believe the Indian Air Force were also invited to bring their Sukhoi’s. It’ll be interesting to see how well they do. In the end, pilot skills do have a lot to do with air to air engagements and all NATO pilots are similiarly trained and cross train with each other but this aircraft gives such an advantage that it is a scary proposition for any plot to have to fly up against anyone piloting a Raptor. As far as anti stealth radar is concerned, it is a myth. If such an animal exists, it is not radar but works on some other principle. If anyone has any information one this, I would be interested to know about it.

]]> Comment on Best Fighter Jet in the World - Best Combat Jet in World by jojo http://www.futurefirepower.com/best-fighter-jet-in-the-world-best-combat-jet-in-world#comment-3502 jojo Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:48:40 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/best-fighter-jet-in-the-world-best-combat-jet-in-world#comment-3502 usa usa usa usa usa usa usa usa usa......... super power country usa usa usa usa usa usa usa usa usa……… super power country

]]> Comment on Best Fighter Jet in the World - Best Combat Jet in World by jojo http://www.futurefirepower.com/best-fighter-jet-in-the-world-best-combat-jet-in-world#comment-3501 jojo Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:46:11 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/best-fighter-jet-in-the-world-best-combat-jet-in-world#comment-3501 f22 is the best fidhter plane in the world.. jojo frm philippines f22 is the best fidhter plane in the world.. jojo frm philippines

]]> Comment on Best Fighter Jet in the World - Best Combat Jet in World by PHANTOM SLAYER http://www.futurefirepower.com/best-fighter-jet-in-the-world-best-combat-jet-in-world#comment-3394 PHANTOM SLAYER Fri, 24 Oct 2008 23:19:59 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/best-fighter-jet-in-the-world-best-combat-jet-in-world#comment-3394 well i think the f22 will kick the othe plins ass like it did to mine well i think the f22 will kick the othe plins ass like it did to mine

]]> Comment on Barrett M107 Sniper Rifle - Future Weapons video by sgt.rage http://www.futurefirepower.com/the-barrett-m107-bmg-50-caliber-sniper-rifle-future-weapons-video#comment-3367 sgt.rage Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:15:47 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/the-barrett-m107-bmg-50-caliber-sniper-rifle-future-weapons-video#comment-3367 i dont care ,we can all sleep easer knowing our boys are useing theses types os bmfg, i dont care ,we can all sleep easer knowing our boys are useing theses types os bmfg,

]]> Comment on The British Accuracy International AS50 BMG Sniper Rifle by Steve http://www.futurefirepower.com/the-british-accuracy-international-as50-bmg-sniper-rifle#comment-3343 Steve Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:58:05 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/the-british-accuracy-international-as50-bmg-sniper-rifle#comment-3343 AS50 > M107 AS50 > M107

]]> Comment on Future Weapons by Boudica http://www.futurefirepower.com/future-weapons#comment-3275 Boudica Sun, 19 Oct 2008 00:50:14 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/future-weapons#comment-3275 Mack is Da Man! I watch FutureWeapons for my dose of Mack, got a Mack Jones goin' on! Mack is one of the most perfect male specimens to walk this earth!! Vannilaguerilla--Mack IS the real deal! Read his bio, the man was a Navy Seal. Romanus---Mack does not "ruin" the show, he IS the show!! He can whisper in my ear (or anywhere else....) any time he wants!! Samuel---jealous much??? Love dat Mack Man! Mack is Da Man! I watch FutureWeapons for my dose of Mack, got a Mack Jones goin’ on! Mack is one of the most perfect male specimens to walk this earth!!

Vannilaguerilla–Mack IS the real deal! Read his bio, the man was a Navy Seal.

Romanus—Mack does not “ruin” the show, he IS the show!! He can whisper in my ear (or anywhere else….) any time he wants!!

Samuel—jealous much???

Love dat Mack Man!

]]> Comment on Barrett REC7 - M468 - Future Assault Rifle by Cj http://www.futurefirepower.com/barrett-rec7-m468-future-assault-rifle#comment-3270 Cj Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:06:32 +0000 http://www.futurefirepower.com/barrett-rec7-m468-future-assault-rifle#comment-3270 I like the Barrett 468, and yes Mr, e, they did take the recoil into account. I like the Barrett 468, and yes Mr, e, they did take the recoil into account.

]]>