Comments for Future Military Weapon Technology - Future Firepower

Comment on Myths About the NATO 5.56 Cartridge by eastern star

eastern star — Tue, 21 May 2013 21:33:45 +0000

In eastern Turkey, Turkish soldiers use hk-33 against Kurdish terorists. But in real combat situations that is revealed that 5.56×45 round is not effective. So production of hk-33 ceased and officials started to develope a new rifle. It is a kind of pistoned ar-10, 7.62×51 NATO…

Comment on MQ9 Reaper – Predator UAV – Iraqi Drone of Death by ES360

ES360 — Tue, 14 May 2013 17:03:00 +0000

you are in reality a good webmaster. The web site loading speed is amazing.
It kind of feels that you’re doing any distinctive trick. Moreover, The contents are masterwork. you’ve performed
a great job in this topic!

Comment on Myths About the NATO 5.56 Cartridge by shooting targets zombies

shooting targets zombies — Sun, 12 May 2013 14:16:24 +0000

Good info. Lucky me I recently found your blog by accident (stumbleupon).

I’ve saved it for later!

Comment on Touch Screen Battlefield Technology in HD by Lizette

Lizette — Sun, 12 May 2013 12:13:49 +0000

You could definitely see your enthusiasm in the work you write.
The world hopes for more passionate writers such as you who
aren’t afraid to mention how they believe. All the time go after your heart.

Comment on Myths About the NATO 5.56 Cartridge by mirena recall

mirena recall — Thu, 02 May 2013 22:28:49 +0000

Highly descriptive post, I liked that bit. Will there
be a part 2?

Comment on CheyTac Intervention M200 Sniper Rifle – .408 Caliber by Cialis Online

Cialis Online — Thu, 02 May 2013 17:59:33 +0000

Your own article offers verified beneficial to me personally.
It’s quite informative and you’re certainly very knowledgeable of this type. You possess opened up my personal eye to different views on this particular subject matter with intriguing and strong content material.

Comment on Kinetic Energy Projectile – KE-projectile by Ashish

Ashish — Thu, 02 May 2013 11:58:52 +0000

I can not vocalize

Comment on All Military Technology Articles by Professional templates

Professional templates — Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:02:23 +0000

It also looks likethe Brits have a tank prototype that can turn invisible. Can you add a video here?

Comment on Polls by Professional Graphics

Professional Graphics — Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:57:08 +0000

I pretty much agree with both polls.

Comment on M4 – M4A1 Carbine – Modern Warfare by Professional Website Graphics

Professional Website Graphics — Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:52:41 +0000

That has the be the most used weapon..i like it because it is lightweight and easy to use.

Comment on Chinese Type 99 Tank – Newest Armor of China by Professional Web Graphics

Professional Web Graphics — Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:35:18 +0000

It looks like weapons are becoming more and more evolved everyday, and the cinese must be proud of themselves.

Comment on Chinese Type 99 Tank – Newest Armor of China by Vitual Casino Bonus Codes

Vitual Casino Bonus Codes — Sun, 21 Apr 2013 20:48:07 +0000

This is my first time visit at here and i am in fact pleassant to read all at
single place.

Comment on Barrett REC7 – M468 – Future Assault Rifle by tapeworm symptoms in cats

tapeworm symptoms in cats — Thu, 11 Apr 2013 19:01:12 +0000

I do not leave a comment, however after looking at a few of the responses on Barrett REC7 – M468
- Future Assault Rifle | Future Military Weapon Technology – Future Firepower.
I actually do have a couple of questions for you if you tend not
to mind. Is it just me or does it appear like a few of these
remarks come across like they are written by brain dead people?
And, if you are posting at additional online sites, I would like to keep up with you.
Could you list of every one of all your social networking pages like your
Facebook page, twitter feed, or linkedin profile?

Comment on Russian Tank Forces – T90 Technology by qbfenila

qbfenila — Wed, 10 Apr 2013 03:56:12 +0000

rcpu [url=http://raybansunglassesonsale.webeden.co.uk/]ray ban sunglasses[/url] [url=http://raybansunglasses2013.webeden.co.uk/]ray ban sunglasses sale[/url] ytgz
[url=http://raybansunglassesonsale.webeden.co.uk/]http://raybansunglassesonsale.webeden.co.uk/[/url] [url=http://raybansunglasses2013.webeden.co.uk/]ray ban sunglasses outlet[/url] emxa
[url=http://raybansunglassesonsale.webeden.co.uk/]ray ban glasses sale[/url] [url=http://raybansunglasses2013.webeden.co.uk/]ray ban uk[/url] ojin
[url=http://raybansunglassesonsale.webeden.co.uk/]ray ban glasses outlet[/url] [url=http://raybansunglasses2013.webeden.co.uk/]ray ban uk[/url] ucdj

waqi
djji
uwcz [url=http://raybansunglassesonsale.webeden.co.uk/][/url] [url=http://raybansunglasses2013.webeden.co.uk/][/url]

Comment on Barrett REC7 – M468 – Future Assault Rifle by Brandon Henandez

Brandon Henandez — Mon, 01 Apr 2013 19:59:40 +0000

Dragon armour can take .50 but not for very long you would need Trauma plates so it wouldent hurt as bad. But dragon armour is changing the flexibility of your cover.

Comment on Railguns – Electric Future Rail Gun – Military Raligun by Ativan

Ativan — Thu, 14 Mar 2013 04:59:30 +0000

What i do not understood is if truth be told how you are no longer really much more
smartly-appreciated than you may be right now.
You are very intelligent. You recognize thus significantly when it
comes to this matter, made me individually imagine it from so many varied angles.
Its like women and men don’t seem to be interested except it’s
one thing to accomplish with Girl gaga! Your individual stuffs excellent.
All the time handle it up!

Comment on Osprey Video by Techsmurf

Techsmurf — Wed, 13 Mar 2013 21:59:47 +0000

Could someone update or reupload the video please? Its not available anymore. Thank you!

Comment on Chinese Type 99 Tank – Newest Armor of China by http://onlinecasinogamescasino.com

http://onlinecasinogamescasino.com — Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:09:09 +0000

I just like the helpful info you provide to your articles.

I’ll bookmark your weblog and test again right here regularly. I’m somewhat certain
I will be informed lots of new stuff right here!
Good luck for the following!

Comment on Myths About the NATO 5.56 Cartridge by big daddy sushi kyoto 52

big daddy sushi kyoto 52 — Mon, 04 Mar 2013 17:00:53 +0000

i like to eat waffles while i shoot my m16 all over infidels face!!!! (:

Comment on Myths About the NATO 5.56 Cartridge by big daddy sushi kyoto 52

big daddy sushi kyoto 52 — Mon, 04 Mar 2013 17:00:09 +0000

i like to eat waffles while i shoot my m16 all over infidels face!!!! (;

Comment on CheyTac Intervention M200 Sniper Rifle – .408 Caliber by Michael

Michael — Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:14:18 +0000

the 50 Cal is the best sniper and has the longest range

Comment on CheyTac Intervention M200 Sniper Rifle – .408 Caliber by lower back pain treatment

lower back pain treatment — Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:51:01 +0000

I happen to be checking out for a little bit for
any top quality articles or blog posts on this kind of area .
Exploring in Google I finally discovered this web site.
Reading this information made me pleased that I’ve found precisely what I needed.

Comment on Myths About the NATO 5.56 Cartridge by TerblTim

TerblTim — Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:08:48 +0000

That was an excellent and informative article.
It finished by asking an elephant of a question…why are “we” still using a direct gas blow-back system?
However, it did NOT address the single loadest and longest-lasting complaint of the 223/5.56 cartridge. That being; that dispite the “nastiness” of the wounds it makes and the greater volume [of ammo] a man can carry, it still Does-Not offer the proverbial “knock-down” of larger calibers, (most notably the 30-cal family.)
This is the single most disconcerting issue of the front-line combat elements who experience many opportunities to evaluate on this subject. That multitude of experiences tends to make the individual’s evaluation become based on the visible results obtained from the different cartridges at the time they are fired, (as opposed to after the shooting stops.)
The technical details don’t seem to matter as much when the charging psyco-jihadist absorbs 3 or 4 hits before giving any sign of succumbing to the cumulative effects of them. When your buddy (using a 30-cal weapon of any description) shoots the next hostile and it takes just ONE SHOT to achieve a knock-down it leaves a lasting impression regarding the expectations of desired effects at the time the shots are being fired. When these differences are seen repeatedly the individual cannot help becoming biased in favor of the weapon that seems to give more of the desired results or fewer of the “undesirable results.”
We all understand the logistical superiority of the wounding capabilities of the 5.56 but during the battle a soldier wants to see the enemy fall down as a result of a hit. Without qualifying remarks, the 30-cal family of weapons offers that highly-reassuring result with far more reliability than lesser calibers.
As a “force multiplier” the 223/5.56 is a failure in the mind of the line soldier simply because it seems to require more shots to achieve the “desired effect.”
Let’s not lose sight of what that desired effect is.
The front-line soldier wants to see his enemy-target FALL DOWN upon being hit! Any other reaction has a negative effect on the confidence he assigns to his weapon. It is a terrible thing to enter into combat with the sure-knowledge that your weapon cannot really be expected to knock-down a solidly hit enemy. This single issue is a huge source/cause of why we have so many soldiers on anti-anxiety medication in the mid-east theater. Lack/loss of confidence in the equipment you are forced to use results in frayed nerves.
Looking at wounds AFTER THE BATTLE is not a realistic way to evaluate the effectiveness of the cartridges DURING THE BATTLE.
Been there, done that.

Comment on Myths About the NATO 5.56 Cartridge by Ressin

Ressin — Sun, 03 Feb 2013 00:39:32 +0000

Ya know, you make some good points…
The biggest one is that people who know little or nothing about combat tend to write as experts.
As a veteran who has used an M14 through the M4′s of today, I would say any of these types of arguments/discussions are academic. Nice to chew back and forth, but do little.
In broad brush strokes, you cannot beat the 5.56 rifle or caliber (for all of the reasons stated in the article above)unless you change your metric. Changing the unit of measure used against this rifle, changes the argument.
Until we come up with an energy weapon, this will be the epoch of kinetic weapons-even if you change something, it is still going to shoot something out of a barrel whether is does it by expanding gases or a magnetic field

Comment on Barrett REC7 – M468 – Future Assault Rifle by Rob

Rob — Fri, 01 Feb 2013 04:25:30 +0000

Does anyone know the standard issue rifle for the 75th regiment aka army rangers?

Comment on Myths About the NATO 5.56 Cartridge by RED

RED — Sun, 13 Jan 2013 22:42:18 +0000

Would you agree that the M4/M16 is not well-liked by members of the United States armed forces due to the difficulty of cleaning it and the weapon’s propensity to jam when exposed to ambient conditions, like air?

Comment on CheyTac Intervention M200 Sniper Rifle – .408 Caliber by Hai

Hai — Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:15:14 +0000

Howdy! Do you know if they make any plugins
to assist with SEO? I’m trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted keywords but I’m not seeing very good results.
If you know of any please share. Cheers!

Comment on Myths About the NATO 5.56 Cartridge by SSGT Pride

SSGT Pride — Wed, 09 Jan 2013 23:52:16 +0000

Look at it like this guys….
We WON the Revolutionary War
We WON the war of 1812
We WON the Civil War (If your a Northie!)
We WON WW1
WE WON WW2
We WON KOREA
All guns shooting 7.62 and Larger

What have we won since switching in Viet Nam to 5.56?
Viet Nam? Nope we just packed up and left
Iraq…nope we just packed up and left
Afghanistan…Nope were about to pack up and leave!

Comment on Myths About the NATO 5.56 Cartridge by Gun Control: To Ban or not to Ban? « The Off Season

Gun Control: To Ban or not to Ban? « The Off Season — Sun, 16 Dec 2012 23:18:44 +0000

[...] substantial damage to the human body. Our military purposely designed this caliber bullet to create “ this massive cavitation by tumbling through the body initiated by inherently unstable flight.”, the .556mm bullet “was meant to tumble through a target, not kill with brute force.” Basically [...]

Comment on M4 – M4A1 Carbine – Modern Warfare by colton

colton — Mon, 10 Dec 2012 18:33:08 +0000

m4al looks cool and all but the bullets are small personally i love ak 47s way better plus the bullets are a good bit bigger