Today Richard Machowicz stated on his show (4/22/09) on the military channel that the AT/4-CS was the first A/T rocket launcher that could be safely fired from within confined spaces. This is incorrect because the Germans came out with the “Amburst” during the 1980s. The “Ambursts” claim to fame was that it could be fired from within confined spaces. I believe that it may have been called the “Amburst 300″. In addition during WWII, the Brits had a spring launched A/T rocket launcher although i realize that is not what he was referring too..
Some time ago i read of and learned of a possible mach 3 stealth forward swept vairiable geometry wing fighter bomber aircraft known as the switchblade in different internet sources and a previous popular science magazine. Is the aircraft real? It was said to be a replacement for the F111 aardvark
4 Responses
None
Posted on May 8th, 2008 at 5:51 am
do they design weapons for all combat machinery or what do they do in this program?
Posted on September 21st, 2008 at 2:03 am
Today Richard Machowicz stated on his show (4/22/09) on the military channel that the AT/4-CS was the first A/T rocket launcher that could be safely fired from within confined spaces. This is incorrect because the Germans came out with the “Amburst” during the 1980s. The “Ambursts” claim to fame was that it could be fired from within confined spaces. I believe that it may have been called the “Amburst 300″. In addition during WWII, the Brits had a spring launched A/T rocket launcher although i realize that is not what he was referring too..
Posted on April 23rd, 2009 at 12:10 am
Some time ago i read of and learned of a possible mach 3 stealth forward swept vairiable geometry wing fighter bomber aircraft known as the switchblade in different internet sources and a previous popular science magazine. Is the aircraft real? It was said to be a replacement for the F111 aardvark
Posted on July 4th, 2009 at 5:13 pm
Add A Comment