Comments on: OICW Future Rifle Technology- Future Force Warrior

By: Jedi

Jedi — Mon, 03 Oct 2011 13:47:01 +0000

I am a jedi

By: efsane95339

efsane95339 — Mon, 09 May 2011 10:47:15 +0000

OICW blueprint made by the method. max file TURKISH LIRA Can I get the form?

By: bmg50cal

bmg50cal — Wed, 02 Feb 2011 08:13:50 +0000

This has got to be a joke if it utilizes so called “clips.”

By: Wolf

Wolf — Thu, 09 Sep 2010 04:06:21 +0000

How this gun can work…

By: Dryadzarmy

Dryadzarmy — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:49:17 +0000

I dont know what these people are saying about lugging it around, its lighter then the m16 with attachments. and practicality? it is very practical, you can turn one squad into an incredibly strong unit, they can take out anything that is hidden for about 1000m and the electronics malfunctioning? im pretty sure they will address that issue seeing the airburst needs it to even work, before you guys comment on this you should look it up properly. this thing will absolutly kick ass if its adopted.

By: will

will — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:24:29 +0000

I disagree with mg i think its a great addition to our military’s aresenal because this thing has the power to take down light tanks or scout vehicles or even a large squad of enemies.so screw the m4 or whatever weapon he mentioned give me one of those anyday!

By: Lehi C

Lehi C — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:45:25 +0000

I agree with M.G….. This weapon’s practicality doesn’t exist in a day to day situation. Tower and Gate watches, maybe, and in moderation. In spec groups, this could be practical, but as M.G. said, we’re not allowed to frag out rooms anymore. If it were to be put in an infantry unit, it should only be 1, 2 max, in the squad carrying it, and even then, those individuals would have to be trained heavily in electronics, as I’m sure the control unit isn’t exactly a simple device, which would incur training expenses, and not just money, but the men that would have to be pulled from their units to be trained on the specifications, maintainance and repair of the weapon….. all in all, a good idea for specific situations, but not very practical as far as mass implementation is concerned….

By: Steve C

Steve C — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:25:18 +0000

This particular weapon development was dropped years ago, since then several parts of the US military have run competitions to replace the M16/M4′s without success (mostly due to politics & costs). The SCAR is one of the few that has managed to be slipped into service with Special forces.

By: M.G

M.G — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:19:28 +0000

This weapon is absurd. The last thing I want to be carrying in the mountains is that stupid heavy bulky nonsense. Instead give me a SCAR stop all this High Speed low drag stupidity. On todays battlefield we aren’t hard knocking houses anyway so there is no need for 20mm explosive rounds. A M67 cooked works just the same, but we aren’t allowed to frag rooms out now anyway. I want something with more knockdown power than 5.56 but, I like the high cap mags and 7.62 can only get 20 round mags 6.5 Grendal has some nasty power and SCAR weapons use a nice round to and you get the same cap I believe. Plenty of options out there just the only people seeing change in weapons seems to be SF. Give some to the grunts, just don’t give us something like the OICW to try and maintain in a warzone I mean seriously a Fire Control computer in a dust storm just asking for malfunctions.

By: smithmyster

smithmyster — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:01:56 +0000

using the Remington 6.8 round instead of the 5.56 is a must for infantry killing power. perhaps extremely dangerous but replacing the air-burst shells with a hydrogen bomb class compound in a small enough amount that it has the blast radius of an RPG. with that kind of shredding power light armored tanks etc. would be decimated as well as that room of terrorists with the window left open.

By: 11b

11b — Mon, 25 May 2009 21:38:30 +0000

Bayonet LMAO.

Why don’t we see if we can fit a mine sweeper, flamethrower, satellite phone, and GPS system while your at it.

By: Ron Anderson

Ron Anderson — Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:30:22 +0000

I can see a lot of mission specific add-on components being developed for this weapon but as core infantry combat rifle it looks like a pretty good system.

By: Shadow

Shadow — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:23:14 +0000

O.O Sweet…
Well i would make both Clips bigger and somehow fit a Sniper Rifle in there but the Design is Awesome!