<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When the Biggest is Just not Big Enough&#8230;  The Ford Class Aircraft Carrier</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough</link>
	<description>The Newest Military Weapon Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:30:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough/comment-page-1#comment-16493</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 05:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough#comment-16493</guid>
		<description>Shi Lang is the name of the admiral (?) that conquered Taiwan in the 1600&#039;s, btw.

Top Gun was filmed on the Ranger.  The overhead shots were surely the Enterprise, but no actual filming took place on her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shi Lang is the name of the admiral (?) that conquered Taiwan in the 1600&#8217;s, btw.</p>
<p>Top Gun was filmed on the Ranger.  The overhead shots were surely the Enterprise, but no actual filming took place on her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cpt F Kos</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough/comment-page-1#comment-14816</link>
		<dc:creator>Cpt F Kos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 23:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough#comment-14816</guid>
		<description>Sad and not enough money for universal health care-the price of empire</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad and not enough money for universal health care-the price of empire</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.N,KEV</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough/comment-page-1#comment-14713</link>
		<dc:creator>R.N,KEV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 07:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough#comment-14713</guid>
		<description>Shi Lang  means reviewed at the bottom of the sea after combat bit like the Argentine Air Force in 82</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shi Lang  means reviewed at the bottom of the sea after combat bit like the Argentine Air Force in 82</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boreas-Rex</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough/comment-page-1#comment-14616</link>
		<dc:creator>Boreas-Rex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 03:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough#comment-14616</guid>
		<description>Just to mention a few things. I deeply believe that we the US have the most impressive Navy in the world. I&#039;m a Navy Submarine Vet and I can tell you this!!! Do not discount the Chinese, that would be a very costly mistake. The Ford looks great on paper, but I have worked on a Grumman Navy project before, and it&#039;s still tits up right now, and that project started in 2000! I hope it all works out that we just build&#039;em and never have to use &#039;em.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to mention a few things. I deeply believe that we the US have the most impressive Navy in the world. I&#8217;m a Navy Submarine Vet and I can tell you this!!! Do not discount the Chinese, that would be a very costly mistake. The Ford looks great on paper, but I have worked on a Grumman Navy project before, and it&#8217;s still tits up right now, and that project started in 2000! I hope it all works out that we just build&#8217;em and never have to use &#8216;em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Bartell</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough/comment-page-1#comment-13915</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Bartell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 00:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough#comment-13915</guid>
		<description>us af employment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>us af employment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattBirm</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough/comment-page-1#comment-12609</link>
		<dc:creator>MattBirm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 17:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough#comment-12609</guid>
		<description>Our armed forces are the best in the world--GO NAVY! But don&#039;t underestimate the Chinese and the new carrier they are building, are they coming to the party late, yes but the Chinese are consummate planners, patient in the extreme, persistent, talented and driven. (Of course so are most of our people.) The real selling point of new navy ships, carriers or otherwise, will be a rail gun system...a carrier and its task force are no good if they are the bottom of the sea and the critical ability to track and remove hostiles from the air or sea (in the form of cruise missiles, etc.) is going to be key. The USS Gerald Ford looks to be an awesome ship and the technology updates look to be quite impressive, especially the new catapault system. 
I love this country!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our armed forces are the best in the world&#8211;GO NAVY! But don&#8217;t underestimate the Chinese and the new carrier they are building, are they coming to the party late, yes but the Chinese are consummate planners, patient in the extreme, persistent, talented and driven. (Of course so are most of our people.) The real selling point of new navy ships, carriers or otherwise, will be a rail gun system&#8230;a carrier and its task force are no good if they are the bottom of the sea and the critical ability to track and remove hostiles from the air or sea (in the form of cruise missiles, etc.) is going to be key. The USS Gerald Ford looks to be an awesome ship and the technology updates look to be quite impressive, especially the new catapault system.<br />
I love this country!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cdydatzigs</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough/comment-page-1#comment-12189</link>
		<dc:creator>Cdydatzigs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 01:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough#comment-12189</guid>
		<description>To be clear, the USS Ranger was never featured in &#039;Top Gun&#039;. You may have your Paramount-made 1986 movies confused. &#039;Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home&#039; had to shoot it&#039;s carrier scenes aboard the USS Ranger in San Diego (which substituted for the Enterprise) because the Big-E was out to sea and unavailable for filming at the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be clear, the USS Ranger was never featured in &#8216;Top Gun&#8217;. You may have your Paramount-made 1986 movies confused. &#8216;Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home&#8217; had to shoot it&#8217;s carrier scenes aboard the USS Ranger in San Diego (which substituted for the Enterprise) because the Big-E was out to sea and unavailable for filming at the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vindicator58</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough/comment-page-1#comment-6837</link>
		<dc:creator>Vindicator58</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 03:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough#comment-6837</guid>
		<description>If you go to goggle earth, you can find the old soviet navy sitting as a rust bucket, including nuclear subs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you go to goggle earth, you can find the old soviet navy sitting as a rust bucket, including nuclear subs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbo</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough/comment-page-1#comment-6235</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough#comment-6235</guid>
		<description>oh yeah, it&#039;s all very impressive, no doubt, but these buckets still couldn&#039;t stop the US &amp; A from getting its ass well and truly whooped in good ole Viet-nam! Hot damn!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh yeah, it&#8217;s all very impressive, no doubt, but these buckets still couldn&#8217;t stop the US &amp; A from getting its ass well and truly whooped in good ole Viet-nam! Hot damn!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough/comment-page-1#comment-5216</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 22:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough#comment-5216</guid>
		<description>from a guy who did time in the air force, the saying is, &quot;second to none&quot; always have been a navy fan.  Always look for peace, always lend a helping hand and nothing wrong with that, but make sure that other hand is a fist just in case! Nothing better to have a navy emblem on that fist.........go Navy go!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from a guy who did time in the air force, the saying is, &#8220;second to none&#8221; always have been a navy fan.  Always look for peace, always lend a helping hand and nothing wrong with that, but make sure that other hand is a fist just in case! Nothing better to have a navy emblem on that fist&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;go Navy go!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fanosprcarrier</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough/comment-page-1#comment-5050</link>
		<dc:creator>fanosprcarrier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 04:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough#comment-5050</guid>
		<description>just a note, considering a US carrier is rarely stationed off a countries coast alone (without another super carrier + another carrier group), any attempt a country makes to create a carrier that is anywhere close to the capacity of one american carrier is moot.  Currently in the gulf, there are 3 carriers on station...... so china can build one ship (their surface fleet is laughable in both size ad ability), and i am not worried 20 and i might think they almost stood a chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just a note, considering a US carrier is rarely stationed off a countries coast alone (without another super carrier + another carrier group), any attempt a country makes to create a carrier that is anywhere close to the capacity of one american carrier is moot.  Currently in the gulf, there are 3 carriers on station&#8230;&#8230; so china can build one ship (their surface fleet is laughable in both size ad ability), and i am not worried 20 and i might think they almost stood a chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ÀâòîËþáèòåëü</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough/comment-page-1#comment-4968</link>
		<dc:creator>ÀâòîËþáèòåëü</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough#comment-4968</guid>
		<description>Ford is a good car :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford is a good car <img src='http://www.futurefirepower.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andre</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough/comment-page-1#comment-4932</link>
		<dc:creator>andre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough#comment-4932</guid>
		<description>Ford the best car :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford the best car <img src='http://www.futurefirepower.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough/comment-page-1#comment-4816</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 06:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough#comment-4816</guid>
		<description>the soviets never had a real carrier ever, they went after submarines now they have a few of those floating around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the soviets never had a real carrier ever, they went after submarines now they have a few of those floating around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fussball</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough/comment-page-1#comment-4769</link>
		<dc:creator>fussball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 10:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough#comment-4769</guid>
		<description>Gute Arbeit hier! Gute Inhalte.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gute Arbeit hier! Gute Inhalte.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoffeeForAll</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough/comment-page-1#comment-4494</link>
		<dc:creator>CoffeeForAll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough#comment-4494</guid>
		<description>The US Navy currently has more fighter aircraft than the US Air Force.  The military brass sees the need to place the force next to the battle and fortunately for us the commitment to do so in a manner that gives us the highest chance of not just survivability, but air supremacy.  Kinda makes the hairs on the back of your neck stand up. How awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US Navy currently has more fighter aircraft than the US Air Force.  The military brass sees the need to place the force next to the battle and fortunately for us the commitment to do so in a manner that gives us the highest chance of not just survivability, but air supremacy.  Kinda makes the hairs on the back of your neck stand up. How awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeftCoastCurmudgeon</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough/comment-page-1#comment-4493</link>
		<dc:creator>LeftCoastCurmudgeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough#comment-4493</guid>
		<description>Is there a better definition of &quot;peace through strength&quot; than a US Navy carrier strike force?

I think not!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a better definition of &#8220;peace through strength&#8221; than a US Navy carrier strike force?</p>
<p>I think not!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough/comment-page-1#comment-4034</link>
		<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough#comment-4034</guid>
		<description>The soviet carriers are really kind of lame, on top of the fact that they are extremely old models and are very vulnerable to sub and surface attack, they are also relatively slow compared to actually speed of our carriers, they have no catapult which gives their aircraft a lower survivability on take off, and makes them use more fuel. Plus the strike group with US carriers make them the most formidable force in the world, with the ability to completely annihilate many countries and a carrying capacity larger than many countries aircraft their is no doubt the Ford class carriers will be the finest ship to ever sail the sea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The soviet carriers are really kind of lame, on top of the fact that they are extremely old models and are very vulnerable to sub and surface attack, they are also relatively slow compared to actually speed of our carriers, they have no catapult which gives their aircraft a lower survivability on take off, and makes them use more fuel. Plus the strike group with US carriers make them the most formidable force in the world, with the ability to completely annihilate many countries and a carrying capacity larger than many countries aircraft their is no doubt the Ford class carriers will be the finest ship to ever sail the sea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cybrludite</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough/comment-page-1#comment-2708</link>
		<dc:creator>Cybrludite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough#comment-2708</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m guessing &quot;Shi Lang&quot; is Mandarin for &quot;target scow&quot;, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m guessing &#8220;Shi Lang&#8221; is Mandarin for &#8220;target scow&#8221;, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Che</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough/comment-page-1#comment-2702</link>
		<dc:creator>Che</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 18:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough#comment-2702</guid>
		<description>Just wait until the Chinese have their Soviet-made Kuznetsov-class aircraft carrier &quot;Shi Lang&quot; operational.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wait until the Chinese have their Soviet-made Kuznetsov-class aircraft carrier &#8220;Shi Lang&#8221; operational.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough/comment-page-1#comment-2323</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 21:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough#comment-2323</guid>
		<description>Is this the DVD you were referring to?  Amazon would be a good place to look.
&lt;iframe src=&quot;http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=militweapo-20&amp;o=1&amp;p=8&amp;l=as1&amp;asins=B00169E5JQ&amp;fc1=000000&amp;IS2=1&amp;lt1=_blank&amp;lc1=0000FF&amp;bc1=FFFFFF&amp;bg1=FFFFFF&amp;f=ifr&quot; style=&quot;width:120px;height:240px;&quot; scrolling=&quot;no&quot; marginwidth=&quot;0&quot; marginheight=&quot;0&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this the DVD you were referring to?  Amazon would be a good place to look.<br />
<iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=militweapo-20&#038;o=1&#038;p=8&#038;l=as1&#038;asins=B00169E5JQ&#038;fc1=000000&#038;IS2=1&#038;lt1=_blank&#038;lc1=0000FF&#038;bc1=FFFFFF&#038;bg1=FFFFFF&#038;f=ifr" style="width:120px;height:240px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thanasy Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough/comment-page-1#comment-2320</link>
		<dc:creator>Thanasy Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 18:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough#comment-2320</guid>
		<description>Where can I get the DVD named CARRIER, recently shown on PBS (Honolulu)?  

(I was in NATS in WW-II.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where can I get the DVD named CARRIER, recently shown on PBS (Honolulu)?  </p>
<p>(I was in NATS in WW-II.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wasp Class Amphibious Attack Ship</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough/comment-page-1#comment-2161</link>
		<dc:creator>Wasp Class Amphibious Attack Ship</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough#comment-2161</guid>
		<description>[...] thing is for sure, there is only 1 thing worse than having a US Navy aircraft carrier show up on your coast, and thatÂ is having a US Navy Wasp class amphibious attack ship show up [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] thing is for sure, there is only 1 thing worse than having a US Navy aircraft carrier show up on your coast, and thatÂ is having a US Navy Wasp class amphibious attack ship show up [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough/comment-page-1#comment-1902</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough#comment-1902</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, just look at the hat worn by the ship&#039;s captain in the movie, it clearly says USS Enterprise.  Likewise, I got all my info from various web sources, not to mention the movie itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, just look at the hat worn by the ship&#8217;s captain in the movie, it clearly says USS Enterprise.  Likewise, I got all my info from various web sources, not to mention the movie itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samson Lee Sang</title>
		<link>http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough/comment-page-1#comment-1901</link>
		<dc:creator>Samson Lee Sang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurefirepower.com/when-the-biggest-is-just-not-big-enough#comment-1901</guid>
		<description>1988 San Francisco Fleet Day I had the privilege of visiting the USS Ranger CV 61.
They were proud to mention they had been the main star of the movie &quot;Top Gun&quot;.
The credits for &quot;Top Gun&quot; mention this as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1988 San Francisco Fleet Day I had the privilege of visiting the USS Ranger CV 61.<br />
They were proud to mention they had been the main star of the movie &#8220;Top Gun&#8221;.<br />
The credits for &#8220;Top Gun&#8221; mention this as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.585 seconds -->
